Z.ai: GLM 5.2 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Compare Z.ai: GLM 5.2 by Zhipu AI against MiMo-V2.5-Pro by Xiaomi, context windows of 1.0M vs 1.0M, tested across 53 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
Z.ai: GLM 5.2
MiMo-V2.5-ProRunner-up
No community votes yet. On paper, Z.ai: GLM 5.2 has the edge — newer, major provider backing.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Z.ai: GLM 5.2
Input
$1.40
Output
$4.40
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Input
$1.00
1.4× cheaper
Output
$3.00
1.5× cheaper
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is cheaper on both — 1.4× input, 1.5× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
27%
MiMo-V2.5-Pro uses 62.5x more emoji
Z.ai: GLM 5.2
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
56%Vocabulary58%
18wSentence Length22w
0.27Hedging0.61
3.7Bold5.7
2.8Lists3.1
0.00Emoji0.63
0.56Headings1.40
0.24Transitions0.02
Based on 27 + 27 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
