GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Inception: Mercury
Compare GPT-3.5 Turbo by OpenAI against Inception: Mercury by Inception, context windows of 16K vs 32K, tested across 54 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
GPT-3.5 Turbo
Inception: Mercury
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
GPT-3.5 Turbo is 5.0x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
GPT-3.5 Turbo
Input
$1.50
6.7× cheaper
Output
$2.00
5.0× cheaper
Inception: Mercury
Input
$10.00
Output
$10.00
GPT-3.5 Turbo is cheaper on both — 6.7× input, 5.0× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
34%
Inception: Mercury uses 489.0x more bold
GPT-3.5 Turbo
Inception: Mercury
61%Vocabulary55%
16wSentence Length40w
0.23Hedging0.39
0.0Bold4.9
3.7Lists3.8
0.00Emoji0.04
0.00Headings1.04
0.38Transitions0.03
Based on 11 + 17 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
