GPT-4o (Omni) vs Claude Opus 4

Compare GPT-4o (Omni) by OpenAI against Claude Opus 4 by Anthropic, in 1 community votes, gpt-4o (omni) wins 100% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 128K vs 200K, tested across 34 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.

Which is better, GPT-4o (Omni) or Claude Opus 4?

GPT-4o (Omni) is the better choice overall, winning 100% of 1 blind community votes on Rival. GPT-4o (Omni) costs $2.5/M input tokens vs $15/M for Claude Opus 4. Context windows: 128K vs 200K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between GPT-4o (Omni) and Claude Opus 4

GPT-4o (Omni) is made by openai while Claude Opus 4 is from anthropic. GPT-4o (Omni) has a 128K token context window compared to Claude Opus 4's 200K. On pricing, GPT-4o (Omni) costs $2.5/M input tokens vs $15/M for Claude Opus 4. In community voting, In 1 community votes, GPT-4o (Omni) wins 100% of head-to-head duels.

In 1 community votes, GPT-4o (Omni) wins 100% of head-to-head duels. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 1+ human preference judgments for this pair.

Our Verdict
GPT-4o (Omni)
GPT-4o (Omni)Winner
Claude Opus 4
Claude Opus 4Runner-up

Pick GPT-4o (Omni). In 1 blind votes, GPT-4o (Omni) wins 100% of the time. That's not luck.

GPT-4o (Omni) is 7.5x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.

Clear winner
Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
100%

Claude Opus 4 uses 4.5x more emoji

GPT-4o (Omni)
Claude Opus 4
54%Vocabulary64%
18wSentence Length62w
0.72Hedging0.52
7.3Bold4.4
5.6Lists9.1
0.03Emoji0.11
1.40Headings1.87
0.26Transitions0.27
Based on 24 + 16 text responses
vs

Ask them anything yourself

GPT-4o (Omni)Claude Opus 4

279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.

We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.

AI Hallucination Index 2026
Free preview13 of 58 slides
FAQ

Common questions