GPT-4o (Omni)
Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.
GPT-4o (Omni) vs GPT-5
Compare GPT-4o (Omni) and GPT-5, both from OpenAI, in 19 community votes, gpt-5 wins 78% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 128K vs 400K, tested across 46 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, GPT-4o (Omni) or GPT-5?
GPT-5 is the better choice overall, winning 78% of 19 blind community votes on Rival. GPT-4o (Omni) costs $2.5/M input tokens vs $1.25/M for GPT-5. Context windows: 128K vs 400K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between GPT-4o (Omni) and GPT-5
GPT-4o (Omni) is made by openai while GPT-5 is from openai. GPT-4o (Omni) has a 128K token context window compared to GPT-5's 400K. On pricing, GPT-4o (Omni) costs $2.5/M input tokens vs $1.25/M for GPT-5. In community voting, In 19 community votes, GPT-5 wins 78% of head-to-head duels.
In 19 community votes, GPT-5 wins 78% of head-to-head duels. GPT-4o (Omni) leads in Conversation, while GPT-5 leads in Reasoning, Image Generation, Web Design. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 19+ human preference judgments for this pair.
Reasoning: GPT-5 wins 71% of votes
Image Generation: GPT-5 wins 100% of votes
Conversation: GPT-4o (Omni) wins 67% of votes
Web Design: GPT-5 wins 100% of votes
Our Verdict
GPT-5Winner
GPT-4o (Omni)Runner-up
Pick GPT-5. In 19 blind votes, GPT-5 wins 78% of the time. That's not luck.
Pick GPT-4o (Omni) for Conversation. Pick GPT-5 for Image Generation, Web Design, Reasoning.
Clear winner
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
93%
GPT-4o (Omni) uses 2.5x more emoji
GPT-4o (Omni)
GPT-5
54%Vocabulary65%
18wSentence Length13w
0.72Hedging0.20
7.3Bold0.2
5.6Lists4.6
0.03Emoji0.00
1.40Headings0.16
0.26Transitions0.03
Based on 24 + 16 text responses
vsAsk them anything yourself
279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.
We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.
Free preview13 of 58 slides
FAQ