GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini vs Llama 4 Scout

Compare GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini by OpenAI against Llama 4 Scout by Meta AI, context windows of 400K vs 10.0M, tested across 54 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.

Which is better, GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini or Llama 4 Scout?

GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini and Llama 4 Scout are both competitive models. GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini costs $1.5/M input tokens vs $0.25/M for Llama 4 Scout. Context windows: 400K vs 10000K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini and Llama 4 Scout

GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini is made by openai while Llama 4 Scout is from meta. GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini has a 400K token context window compared to Llama 4 Scout's 10000K. On pricing, GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini costs $1.5/M input tokens vs $0.25/M for Llama 4 Scout.

Our Verdict
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
Llama 4 Scout
Llama 4 ScoutRunner-up

No community votes yet. On paper, GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini has the edge — bigger model tier, newer.

Llama 4 Scout is 12x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.

Too close to call
Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
98%

Llama 4 Scout uses 3.9x more headings

GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
Llama 4 Scout
65%Vocabulary43%
20wSentence Length42w
0.56Hedging0.81
3.3Bold4.1
3.4Lists7.3
0.00Emoji0.00
0.08Headings0.30
0.05Transitions0.04
Based on 13 + 10 text responses
vs

Ask them anything yourself

GPT-5.1-Codex-MiniLlama 4 Scout

279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.

We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.

AI Hallucination Index 2026
Free preview13 of 58 slides
FAQ

Common questions