GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini vs Llama 4 Scout
Compare GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini by OpenAI against Llama 4 Scout by Meta AI, context windows of 400K vs 10.0M, tested across 54 shared challenges. Updated May 2026.
Which is better, GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini or Llama 4 Scout?
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini and Llama 4 Scout are both competitive models. GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini costs $1.5/M input tokens vs $0.25/M for Llama 4 Scout. Context windows: 400K vs 10000K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini and Llama 4 Scout
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini is made by openai while Llama 4 Scout is from meta. GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini has a 400K token context window compared to Llama 4 Scout's 10000K. On pricing, GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini costs $1.5/M input tokens vs $0.25/M for Llama 4 Scout.
Per 1M tokens
Llama 4 Scout is cheaper on both — 6.0× input, 12× output
No community votes yet. On paper, GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini has the edge — bigger model tier, newer.
Llama 4 Scout is 12x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Style Comparison
Llama 4 Scout uses 3.9x more headings
