GPT-5.1vsQwen3 Coder Next
Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper than GPT-5.1 at $0.2/M vs $1.25/M input tokens.
| Spec | GPT-5.1 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $1.25/M tokens | $0.2/M tokens |
| Output price | $10/M tokens | $1.5/M tokens |
| Context window | 400K tokens | 262K tokens |
| Weights | Closed | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Nov 2025 | Feb 2026 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 76.3% | 70.6% |
Our Verdict
GPT-5.1
Qwen3 Coder NextRunner-up
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, GPT-5.1 has the edge: bigger model tier, bigger context window, major provider backing.
Qwen3 Coder Next costs 6.7x less per token.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
GPT-5.1
Input
$1.25
Output
$10.00
Qwen3 Coder Next
Input
$0.20
6.3× cheaper
Output
$1.50
6.7× cheaper
Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper on both: 6.3× input, 6.7× output.
Where to run it
6 hosts, cheapest first
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 9 Sep 2026.
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
45%
Qwen3 Coder Next uses 83.8x more emoji
GPT-5.1
Qwen3 Coder Next
62%Vocabulary58%
19wSentence Length19w
0.29Hedging0.27
3.5Bold6.4
7.2Lists4.4
0.00Emoji0.84
0.61Headings0.98
0.03Transitions0.06
Based on 14 + 23 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
More comparisons
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Ox AlphaNew provider
Qwen3 Coder Next vs MiniMax M3New provider
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Claude Opus 4New provider
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Claude Opus 4.1New provider
Qwen3 Coder Next vs GPT-5.2Cross-provider
Qwen3 Coder Next vs GPT-5.2 ChatCross-provider
Qwen3 Coder Next vs GPT-5.2 ProCross-provider
Qwen3 Coder Next vs GPT-5.3 ChatCross-provider