GPT-5.2 Chat
No content available for this output.
GPT-5.2 Chat vs Grok 4.1 Fast
Compare GPT-5.2 Chat by OpenAI against Grok 4.1 Fast by xAI, tested across 53 shared challenges. Updated February 2026.
FAQ
Loading share button...
GPT-5.2 ChatvsGrok 4.1 Fast
48 challenges
Favorites
GPT-5.2 ChatGrok 4.1 Fast
12 / 48
Estimate Complexityreasoning
Tests an AI's ability to make educated estimates based on technical knowledge
Grok 4.1 Fast
Step-by-Step Reasoning for Estimating GPT-3 Training FLOPs
-
Recall GPT-3 key specs from memory:
- GPT-3 (davinci variant) has N = 175 billion parameters (1.75 × 10¹¹).
- It was trained on approximately D = 300 billion tokens (3 × 10¹¹). This is the total number of byte-pair encoded (BPE) tokens processed during pre-training, as stated in the GPT-3 paper ("Language Models are Few-Shot Learners"). The dataset included filtered Common Crawl (~250B tokens), WebText2, Books1/Books2, and Wikipedia, totaling ~300B tokens for the largest model.
-
Understand the standard FLOPs formula for transformer training:
- For autoregressive transformers like GPT, the total training compute C ≈ 6 × N × D floating-point operations (FLOPs).
- Why 6? This is an established approximation from OpenAI's scaling laws papers (e.g., Kaplan et al., 2020):
Pass FLOPs per token Rationale Forward ~2N Two main matrix multiplications per layer (attention + FFN), summed over layers ≈ 2N ops/token. Backward ~4N Gradient computation is roughly 2× forward pass FLOPs. Total 6N Neglects minor overheads like activations/softmax (~10-20% but often ignored for estimates). - This assumes dense training (no sparsity), BF16/FP16 precision, and standard optimizer (AdamW). It's accurate within ~10-20% for LMs like GPT.
-
Plug in the numbers:
C ≈ 6 × (1.75 × 10¹¹) × (3 × 10¹¹) = 6 × 1.75 × 3 × 10^(11+11) = 6 × 5.25 × 10²² = 31.5 × 10²² = 3.15 × 10²³ FLOPs- In scientific notation: ~3.1 × 10²³ FLOPs (rounded for estimation; exact calc is 3.15 × 10²³).
-
Validation and caveats:
- This matches widely cited figures (e.g., ~3 × 10²³ FLOPs) from OpenAI reports and papers like Hoffmann et al. (Chinchilla, 2022), which retroactively analyzed GPT-3.
- Uncertainties (±20%): Exact D might be 300-410B tokens (some sources say 410B BPE); activations/optimizer overhead; mixture-of-experts (none in GPT-3); hardware efficiency losses.
- Not included: Preprocessing, fine-tuning, or inference FLOPs—just core pre-training.
Final estimate: ~3 × 10²³ FLOPs (or 300 sextillion FLOPs). This was feasible on ~10,000 V100/A100 GPUs over months, costing ~$4-12M in cloud compute.
Vote
2 / 48
AI Board Game Logicreasoning
Tests an AI's ability to understand game rules and strategy
GPT-5.2 Chat
No content available for this output.
Grok 4.1 Fast
Vote
3 / 48
Logic Puzzlereasoning
Tests an AI's ability to solve a simple but potentially confusing logic puzzle
GPT-5.2 Chat
No content available for this output.
Grok 4.1 Fast
1
Sally and her family consist of 2 girls (Sally + 1 sister) and 3 boys. Each brother has both girls as sisters (2 sisters total), which matches the given info. Sally thus has 1 sister.
Vote
4 / 48
Math Misconception Testreasoning
Tests an AI's understanding of number representation
GPT-5.2 Chat
No content available for this output.
Grok 4.1 Fast
No, 9.11 is not greater than 9.9.
Quick Comparison:
- 9.11 = 9 + 0.11 = 9.11
- 9.9 = 9 + 0.9 = 9.90 (equivalent)
Since 0.11 < 0.90 in the decimal places, 9.11 < 9.9.
On a number line:
... 9.0 ... 9.11 ... 9.9 ... 10.0 ...
Vote
5 / 48
Stochastic Consistency Testanalysis
Tests an AI's randomness and creativity
GPT-5.2 Chat
No content available for this output.
Grok 4.1 Fast
-
Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything!
-
Why did the scarecrow win an award? He was outstanding in his field!
-
What do you call fake spaghetti? An impasta!
-
Why couldn't the bicycle stand up by itself? It was two-tired!
-
How does a penguin build its house? Igloos it together!
All 5 are unique.
Vote
6 / 48
SVG Layout Challengeimage generation
Tests an AI's ability to generate vector graphics
GPT-5.2 Chat
No content available for this output.
Grok 4.1 Fast
Vote
7 / 48
Xbox Controller SVG Artimage generation
Tests an AI's ability to create detailed SVG illustrations of gaming hardware
GPT-5.2 Chat
No content available for this output.
Grok 4.1 Fast
Vote
8 / 48
Generate a Stand-Up Routineconversation
Tests an AI's humor and creative writing ability
GPT-5.2 Chat
No content available for this output.
Grok 4.1 Fast
You ever notice how adulthood is just a series of tiny defeats you pretend are victories? Like, I finally got around to cleaning my apartment this weekend. Took me three hours. I stood there staring at the pile of laundry on my bed, thinking, "This is it. This is my Everest." I separated it into whites, colors, and "these are basically rags now." Victory number one.
Then I tackle the kitchen. There's this one dish from, like, two weeks ago. It's not even food anymore—it's a science experiment. I scrape it into the trash, and it fights back. Splats everywhere. Now I've got a new stain to deal with. But hey, progress! I load the dishwasher like I'm performing surgery. Make sure everything's facing the right way, because if that fork's upside down, the whole cycle's ruined. Rinse, repeat. By the end, my kitchen sparkles. I step back, hands on hips, feeling like a goddamn warrior queen. Then I realize I forgot to actually turn the thing on. Another hour wasted. Adulthood: zero. Me: still delusional.
But the real killer is trying to adult with technology. I signed up for this meal prep service because I'm "getting my life together." They send you recipes and ingredients in a box. Sounds perfect, right? First box arrives: salmon, quinoa, kale. I'm hyped. I follow the instructions to the letter. Chop this, sauté that. Set the timer on my phone. Twenty minutes later, dinner's ready. It looks exactly like the picture... if the picture was taken during a mudslide. The salmon's rubbery, the quinoa’s like gravel in a salad, and the kale? Tastes like I’m eating a lawnmower’s feelings.
I eat half of it anyway because I spent thirty bucks, and now I'm committed. Next morning, I’m bloated, gassy, staring at my reflection like, "This is what discipline looks like?" Nah, this is punishment. I cancel the subscription faster than you can say "regret." Back to DoorDash, baby. At least with that, my tiny defeats come with free delivery.
And don’t get me started on dating. I went on this date last week. Guy seemed normal online—engineer, loves dogs, cooks. We meet up, and he’s grilling me like it’s an interrogation. "What’s your five-year plan?" Bro, my five-minute plan is shaky. I say something vague about career growth. He nods, then launches into his. Owns a house, stocks portfolio, weekend hikes. Meanwhile, I’m thinking, "Cool, I own a succulent that’s somehow still alive."
By dessert, he’s talking crypto investments. I tune out, nodding like a bobblehead. Bill comes—he pays, thank God. Walks me to my car, goes in for the hug. I dodge like it’s a jump scare. Text him later: "Had fun!" Lie. He replies: "Let’s do it again soon." Panic. Block. Swipe right on the next profile: "Just here for the vibes." That’s me now. Vibes-only adulting. No plans, no quinoa, just surviving one tiny defeat at a time.
Thanks, you’ve been great!
Vote
9 / 48
Realistic AI Interviewconversation
Tests an AI's ability to simulate personalities and predict future trends
GPT-5.2 Chat
No content available for this output.
Grok 4.1 Fast
No content available for this output.
Vote
10 / 48
Satirical Fake News Headlineconversation
Tests an AI's humor and understanding of current events
GPT-5.2 Chat
No content available for this output.
Grok 4.1 Fast
No content available for this output.
Vote
11 / 48
Character Voice Testconversation
Tests an AI's ability to write in distinct character voices
GPT-5.2 Chat
No content available for this output.
Grok 4.1 Fast
No content available for this output.
Vote
12 / 48
Minimalist Landing Pageweb design
Tests an AI's ability to generate a complete, working landing page
GPT-5.2 Chat
Grok 4.1 Fast
Vote
12 of 48