Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. GPT-5.2 ChatvsQwen3 Coder
Updated Dec 2025

GPT-5.2 ChatvsQwen3 Coder

Qwen3 Coder is cheaper than GPT-5.2 Chat at $0.22/M vs $1.75/M input tokens.

GPT-5.2 Chat and Qwen3 Coder compared across 53 shared prompts
SpecGPT-5.2 ChatQwen3 Coder
Input price$1.75/M tokens$0.22/M tokens
Output price$14/M tokens$0.95/M tokens
Context window128K tokens—
WeightsClosedOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedDec 2025Jul 2025
SWE-bench Verified80.0%69.6%
Our Verdict
GPT-5.2 Chat
GPT-5.2 Chat
Qwen3 Coder
Qwen3 Coder

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

Qwen3 Coder costs 15x less per token.

Too close to call
API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

GPT-5.2 Chat
Input
$1.75
Output
$14.00
Qwen3 Coder
Input
$0.22
8.0× cheaper
Output
$0.95
15× cheaper

Qwen3 Coder is cheaper on both: 8.0× input, 15× output.

Where to run it

6 hosts, cheapest first

GPT-5.2 Chat1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
Azure AI Foundry$1.75 in·$14.00 out·128k—
Qwen3 Coder5 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
Google Vertex AI$0.22 in·$1.80 out·262k·99.4% upDDeepInfrafp4$0.30 in·$1.00 out·262k·98.1% upVVenicefp8$0.35 in·$1.50 out·256k·95.7% upNNovitafp8$0.38 in·$1.55 out·262k·95.9% upAlibaba Cloud$0.97 in·$4.88 out·262k·99.9% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 9 Sep 2026.

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
49%

Qwen3 Coder uses 3.8x more sentence length

GPT-5.2 Chat
Qwen3 Coder
66%Vocabulary61%
16wSentence Length62w
0.41Hedging0.62
9.6Bold4.4
4.4Lists4.9
0.31Emoji0.37
1.20Headings1.31
0.27Transitions0.17
Based on 16 + 28 text responses
Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

GPT-5.2 Chat logoOx Alpha logo
GPT-5.2 Chat vs Ox AlphaNew provider
Qwen3 Coder logoMiniMax M3 logo
Qwen3 Coder vs MiniMax M3New provider
Qwen3 Coder logoClaude Opus 4 logo
Qwen3 Coder vs Claude Opus 4New provider
Qwen3 Coder logoClaude Opus 4.1 logo
Qwen3 Coder vs Claude Opus 4.1New provider
GPT-5.2 Chat logoGLM 4.6 logo
GPT-5.2 Chat vs GLM 4.6New provider
GPT-5.2 Chat logoGLM 4.7 logo
GPT-5.2 Chat vs GLM 4.7New provider
GPT-5.2 Chat logoGLM 4.7 Flash logo
GPT-5.2 Chat vs GLM 4.7 FlashNew provider
GPT-5.2 Chat logoGLM 5 logo
GPT-5.2 Chat vs GLM 5New provider
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed