GPT-5.2
Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.
GPT-5.2 vs Claude Opus 4
Compare GPT-5.2 by OpenAI against Claude Opus 4 by Anthropic, in 6 community votes, gpt-5.2 wins 67% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 400K vs 200K, tested across 34 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, GPT-5.2 or Claude Opus 4?
GPT-5.2 is the better choice overall, winning 67% of 6 blind community votes on Rival. GPT-5.2 costs $1.75/M input tokens vs $15/M for Claude Opus 4. Context windows: 400K vs 200K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between GPT-5.2 and Claude Opus 4
GPT-5.2 is made by openai while Claude Opus 4 is from anthropic. GPT-5.2 has a 400K token context window compared to Claude Opus 4's 200K. On pricing, GPT-5.2 costs $1.75/M input tokens vs $15/M for Claude Opus 4. In community voting, In 6 community votes, GPT-5.2 wins 67% of head-to-head duels.
In 6 community votes, GPT-5.2 wins 67% of head-to-head duels. GPT-5.2 has the edge overall, but performance varies by task type. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 6+ human preference judgments for this pair.
Web Design: GPT-5.2 and Claude Opus 4 are tied
Our Verdict
GPT-5.2Winner
Claude Opus 4Runner-up
Pick GPT-5.2. In 6 blind votes, GPT-5.2 wins 67% of the time. That's not luck.
GPT-5.2 is 5.4x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Clear winner
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
99%
Claude Opus 4 uses 3.8x more sentence length
GPT-5.2
Claude Opus 4
64%Vocabulary64%
16wSentence Length62w
0.34Hedging0.52
9.4Bold4.4
3.9Lists9.1
0.06Emoji0.11
0.89Headings1.87
0.31Transitions0.27
Based on 15 + 16 text responses
vsAsk them anything yourself
279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.
We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.
Free preview13 of 58 slides
FAQ