Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. GPT-5.2vsQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Updated Dec 2025

GPT-5.2vsQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 is cheaper than GPT-5.2 at $0.2/M vs $1.75/M input tokens.

GPT-5.2 and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 compared across 53 shared prompts
SpecGPT-5.2Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Input price$1.75/M tokens$0.2/M tokens
Output price$14/M tokens$0.8/M tokens
Context window400K tokens131K tokens
WeightsClosedOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedDec 2025Jul 2025
Our Verdict
GPT-5.2
GPT-5.2
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Runner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, GPT-5.2 has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window, major provider backing.

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 costs 18x less per token.

Slight edge
API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

GPT-5.2
Input
$1.75
Output
$14.00
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Input
$0.20
8.8× cheaper
Output
$0.80
18× cheaper

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 is cheaper on both: 8.8× input, 18× output.

Where to run it

6 hosts, cheapest first

GPT-5.22 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
Azure AI Foundry$1.75 in·$14.00 out·400k·99.6% upOpenAI$1.75 in·$14.00 out·400k·99% up
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 25074 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
SStreamLake$0.05 in·$0.19 out·128k·98.9% upSSiliconFlowfp8$0.09 in·$0.30 out·262k·97.7% upNNebiusfp8$0.10 in·$0.30 out·262k·95% upAlibaba Cloud$0.13 in·$0.52 out·131k·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 9 Sep 2026.

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
51%

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 uses 18.9x more emoji

GPT-5.2
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
64%Vocabulary55%
16wSentence Length19w
0.34Hedging0.46
9.4Bold6.4
3.9Lists3.9
0.06Emoji1.10
0.89Headings0.86
0.31Transitions0.14
Based on 15 + 28 text responses
Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 logoOx Alpha logo
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs Ox AlphaNew provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 logoMiniMax M3 logo
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs MiniMax M3New provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 logoClaude Opus 4 logo
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs Claude Opus 4New provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 logoClaude Opus 4.1 logo
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs Claude Opus 4.1New provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 logoOpenAI o4-mini logo
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs OpenAI o4-miniCross-provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 logoOpenAI o4 Mini High logo
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs OpenAI o4 Mini HighCross-provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 logoGPT-1 logo
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs GPT-1Cross-provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 logoOptimus Alpha logo
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs Optimus AlphaNew provider
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed