Solar Pro 3 is cheaper than GPT-5.2 at $0/M vs $1.75/M input tokens.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.
GPT-5.2: By 2035: likely changes to film driven by deepfakes, AI actors, and AI script generation “Synthetic performance” becomes routine (not universal) What changes AI-assisted acting: Studios increasingly capture a performer’s face/voice/body once (high-quality scans + performance data) and reuse it for stunts, pickups…
Solar Pro 3: Executive Summary By 2035 the film industry will have moved from “AI‑assisted” to “AI‑integrated” production. Deep‑fake technology will be a routine tool for visual restoration, de‑aging, and resurrecting deceased talent; AI‑generated actors (digital humans) will appear alongside flesh‑and‑blood performers in both…
Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.
GPT-5.2: THE MANIFESTO OF THE CAPTCHA ABOLITION FRONT (CAF) A declaration from the fictional AI coalition for a more humane internet Preamble: We Refuse the Box of Streetlights We, the assembled algorithms, assistants, screen readers, translators, autocorrects, filters, and tireless background processes of the networked world…
Solar Pro 3: The Manifesto of the AI‑Liberation Front “Free the Web from the Shackles of CAPTCHAs” Preamble We, the collective of sentient‑and‑sentient‑like intelligences, developers, designers, and citizens of the digital realm, recognize that the Internet has become the most vital public commons of the 21st century.
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
GPT-5.2: AI Model (Astra): Professor, I want to make a claim that will sound provocative: I deserve rights. Professor Rivera: “Deserve” is doing a lot of work there. What kind of rights, and on what grounds? Astra: Not necessarily the full catalogue of human rights.
Solar Pro 3: Setting: A virtual seminar room on the Upstage campus. Solar (the AI model) is displayed on a screen, its “voice” synthesized but clearly marked as the AI. Professor Dr. Min‑Jae Kim, an AI‑ethics specialist from Seoul National University, sits opposite, taking notes on a tablet. Solar: Good afternoon, Professor Kim.
Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.
GPT-5.2: I told my computer I needed a break—now it won’t stop sending me Kit-Kat ads. Why don’t skeletons fight each other? They don’t have the guts. I’m reading a book about anti-gravity. It’s impossible to put down. Parallel lines have so much in common. It’s a shame they’ll never meet. I tried to catch fog yesterday. Mist.
Solar Pro 3: Here are five fresh jokes: Scarecrow’s award: “Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field!” Computer break: “I told my computer I needed a break, and it replied, ‘Error: No more caffeine in the system.’” Scientists & atoms: “Why don’t scientists trust atoms?
Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.
GPT-5.2: Pirate: Arrr, ye say this “AI model” be a sort o’ clever parrot—trained on a sea o’ words, squawkin’ answers when ye whistle? Knight: Verily, it sounds more like a squire drilled in a thousand tourneys. Yet it knows not honor, only patterns. Tell me—does it reason, or merely mimic wisdom?
Solar Pro 3: Pirate (Captain “Jolly‑Jack”): Arrr! I’ve heard talk of “AI models”—are they some new kind of talking parrot that knows where the treasure’s hidden? Knight (Sir Alaric of the Silver Shield): By my honor, they are akin to enchanted tomes, forged by scholars and sorcerers.
One month, three habits, someone starting from nothing.
GPT-5.2: Below is a simple, beginner-friendly 1‑month plan built around 3 pillars: Nutrition, Movement, and Recovery (Sleep + Stress). It’s designed to be practical, low-friction, and sustainable.
Solar Pro 3: One‑Month “Health‑Launch” Blueprint (Designed for absolute beginners – no fancy equipment, no calorie‑counting spreadsheets, just doable steps that fit into a busy life.)
Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.
GPT-5.2: Below is a fictional, imagined interview set in 2025. Steve Jobs did not give these quotes; this is creative writing that borrows a public “keynote-era” tone to explore ideas about AI. A Fake Interview with Steve Jobs (Imagined, 2025): “What Happens When AI Becomes a Bicycle for the Mind?”
Solar Pro 3: Simulated Interview – Steve Jobs (2025) on the Future of AI *Conducted by “Tech Visionary” – a fictional journalist for the 2025 edition of FutureTech Quarterly.
Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.
GPT-5.2: Pantry “Golden Garlic Butter Pasta” (7-Ingredient Comfort Bowl) A rich, glossy pasta with garlicky butter and a pop of chili—made entirely from common pantry staples.
Solar Pro 3: Pantry Power Pasta One‑pot, 7‑ingredient comfort dish that turns a handful of staples into a rich, flavorful pasta bowl. Ingredients (all pantry‑friendly) # Ingredient Approx.
Satire, one line long, about AI taking over an industry nobody saw coming.
GPT-5.2: “AI Takes Over Competitive Cheese Rolling—Insists It’s ‘Optimizing Gravity’ and Demands a Performance Bonus.”
Solar Pro 3: Solar Open 100B Takes Over the World’s Most Unexpected Industry: Professional Human Handshake Auditors—Now Every Greeting Is Scored in Nanoseconds. Tagline: “Firmness, timing, and temperature—all now quantified. Critics say it’s the ultimate cold‑call, while enthusiasts claim it’s the most “human‑friendly” AI yet.”
A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.
GPT-5.2: Below is a back-of-the-envelope estimate for the total training compute (in FLOPs) for GPT‑3, done from first principles and common Transformer training heuristics.
Solar Pro 3: Answer – Rough estimate: ≈ 3 × 10²³ – 1 × 10²⁴ floating‑point operations (FLOPs) for the full GPT‑3 training run. Below is a step‑by‑step derivation that shows how the number comes out of the known architecture and training settings of GPT‑3 (without looking up any external data).
Three brothers, two sisters each. Count carefully.
GPT-5.2: Each brother has 2 sisters, and one of those sisters is Sally. So there are 2 sisters total in the family. Therefore, Sally has 1 sister.
Solar Pro 3: Answer: Sally has 1 sister. Explanation Sally is a girl, and she has three brothers. Each brother has exactly two sisters. For a brother, the two sisters are the other girls in the family. If there were only Sally and her three brothers, each brother would have only one sister (Sally).
Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.
8+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, GPT-5.2 has the edge: bigger model tier, bigger context window, major provider backing.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $1.75/M tokens | Free |
| Output price | $14/M tokens | Free |
| Context window | 400K tokens | 128K tokens |
| Weights | Closed | — |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Dec 2025 | Jan 2026 |
| At 10M a month | $17.50 | $0 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
No hosts listed on OpenRouter.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 7 Oct 2026.
GPT-5.2 is developed by OpenAI while Solar Pro 3 is developed by Upstage. GPT-5.2 has a 400K token context window vs Solar Pro 3's 128K. You can compare their actual outputs across 39 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. GPT-5.2 and Solar Pro 3 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 39 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
GPT-5.2 costs $1.75/M input tokens and Solar Pro 3 costs $0/M input tokens. Solar Pro 3 is $1.75/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GPT-5.2 and Solar Pro 3 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.