GPT-5.5vsQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 is cheaper than GPT-5.5 at $0.2/M vs $5/M input tokens.
| Spec | GPT-5.5 | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $5/M tokens | $0.2/M tokens |
| Output price | $30/M tokens | $0.8/M tokens |
| Context window | 1.1M tokens | 131K tokens |
| Weights | Closed | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Apr 2026 | Jul 2025 |
Our Verdict
GPT-5.5
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Runner-up
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, GPT-5.5 has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window, major provider backing.
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 costs 38x less per token.
Slight edge
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
GPT-5.5
Input
$5.00
Output
$30.00
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Input
$0.20
25× cheaper
Output
$0.80
38× cheaper
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 is cheaper on both: 25× input, 38× output.
Where to run it
7 hosts, cheapest first
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 9 Sep 2026.
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
38%
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 uses 110.4x more emoji
GPT-5.5
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
58%Vocabulary55%
18wSentence Length19w
0.74Hedging0.46
2.9Bold6.4
5.1Lists3.9
0.00Emoji1.10
1.68Headings0.86
0.03Transitions0.14
Based on 26 + 28 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
More comparisons
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs Ox AlphaNew provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs MiniMax M3New provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs Claude Opus 4New provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs Claude Opus 4.1New provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs Gemma 3 12BNew provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs Gemma 3 27BNew provider
GPT-5.5 vs Gemma 3n 2BNew provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs Gemma 3n 4BNew provider