GPT OSS 120B vs Thinking Machines: Inkling
Compare GPT OSS 120B by OpenAI against Thinking Machines: Inkling by Thinking Machines, context windows of 131K vs 1.0M, tested across 53 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
GPT OSS 120B
Thinking Machines: Inkling
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
GPT OSS 120B is 5.1x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
GPT OSS 120B
Input
$0.18
5.6× cheaper
Output
$0.80
5.1× cheaper
Thinking Machines: Inkling
Input
$1.00
Output
$4.05
GPT OSS 120B is cheaper on both — 5.6× input, 5.1× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
71%
GPT OSS 120B uses 4.0x more emoji
GPT OSS 120B
Thinking Machines: Inkling
52%Vocabulary57%
19wSentence Length19w
0.28Hedging0.30
7.4Bold5.0
1.8Lists2.7
0.15Emoji0.04
0.73Headings0.49
0.17Transitions0.06
Based on 21 + 27 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
