GPT OSS 120B vs Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)
Compare GPT OSS 120B by OpenAI against Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) by Qwen, context windows of 131K vs 1.0M, tested across 37 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
GPT OSS 120B
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
GPT OSS 120B is 5.0x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
GPT OSS 120B
Input
$0.18
2.2× cheaper
Output
$0.80
5.0× cheaper
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)
Input
$0.40
Output
$4.00
GPT OSS 120B is cheaper on both — 2.2× input, 5.0× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
70%
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) uses 2.5x more lists
GPT OSS 120B
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)
52%Vocabulary54%
19wSentence Length15w
0.28Hedging0.36
7.4Bold7.0
1.8Lists4.6
0.15Emoji0.34
0.73Headings0.94
0.17Transitions0.09
Based on 21 + 18 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
