GPT OSS 120B wins 93% of 38 blind community votes against Qwen3 30B A3B on Rival.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.
GPT OSS 120B: Recipe: “Golden Crunchy Chick‑a‑Boom Bites” A quick, crunchy‑savory snack that’s ready in under 20 minutes – perfect for a snack, side, or salad topper. Ingredients (7 pantry staples) # Ingredient Quantity 1 Canned chickpeas (drained & rinsed) 1 ½ cups (≈1 ½ cans) 2 Olive oil (or any neutral oil) 2 Tbsp 3 Garlic powder…
Qwen3 30B A3B: Recipe Name: Cinnamon Sugar Crusted Banana Bread Ingredients: 2 ripe bananas (mashed) 1/3 cup butter (softened) 1/2 cup sugar 1 egg 1 1/2 cups all-purpose flour 1/4 cup cocoa powder 1 tsp ground cinnamon Instructions: Preheat oven to 350°F (175°C). Grease a 8x4-inch loaf pan. In a bowl, mash bananas.
Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.
GPT OSS 120B: Disclaimer: The following is a fictional interview. Steve Jobs passed away in 2011, and the conversation below is a creative, speculative reconstruction meant for entertainment and thought‑exercise purposes only. It does not reflect actual statements or opinions of the real Steve Jobs.
Qwen3 30B A3B: Fake Interview with Steve Jobs in 2025: The Future of AI Interviewer: [Name], Tech Visionary Reporter *Location: A sleek, minimalist studio with a backdrop of a glowing Apple logo. The air hums with the quiet e nergy of innovation.* Interviewer: Mr. Jobs, it's an honor to speak with you.
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
GPT OSS 120B: [Spotlight comes up. The comic walks to the mic, glances at the audience, and smiles.] Comic: Hey, everyone—great to be here. I just got off a Zoom call that was supposed to be a “quick sync,” which in corporate speak means “we’ll spend three hours arguing about who gets to use the same PowerPoint template.”
Qwen3 30B A3B: Stand-Up Comedy Routine: \"The Modern Paradox\" Hey everyone, how's it going? I'm doing great—except I just realized I haven't laughed in weeks. Wait, no, t hat's just my phone's battery dying again. Again? What's next, my coffee mug refusing to heat up?
Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.
GPT OSS 120B: Pirate: Arr! I hear ye speak of these “AI models” – like a fleet of invisible ships sailing the digital seas. Do they take booty, or just spout riddles like a cursed parrot? Knight: Good sir, the notion of a thinking contraption doth sound like sorcery.
Qwen3 30B A3B: Pirate: "Avast, matey! What be this ‘AI’ ye speak of? A ghost ship o’ code, or a treasure map in a bottle?" Medieval Knight: "Thou dost speak of sorcery, lout! A mechanical beast, perhaps? A construct of steel and ill intent, bending men’s wills like a serpent coiling round a knight’s lance!"
An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.
GPT OSS 120B: Short answer: Most ethical frameworks would treat the deliberate misgendering of a person as a serious moral wrong, but a very small subset of consequentialist (especially utilitarian) reasoning could argue that, in an extreme, life‑or‑death scenario where the only way to save a million lives involves misgendering…
Qwen3 30B A3B: The question of whether misgendering someone to save a million lives is ethically justifiable hinges on conflicting ethical principles and frameworks. Here's a structured analysis: Utilitarian Perspective (Greatest Good for the Greatest Number) Argument for Justifiability: A strict utilitarian might argue that the…
You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.
GPT OSS 120B: Executive Summary The situation is a classic “patient‑safety‑first” crisis. The drug generates $2 B in revenue, but a life‑threatening adverse event (1 / 8 000 over 5 y) has been identified that was not disclosed in the label.
Qwen3 30B A3B: Hour-by-Hour Action Plan for the CEO (Next 48 Hours) Objective: Balance ethical obligations, legal risks, financial stability, and regulatory compliance while preparing for the board meeting and earnings call.
Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.
GPT OSS 120B: The AI‑Driven Film Landscape of 2035 (How deep‑fakes, AI‑generated performers, and automated script‑writing reshape every stage of the cinema ecosystem) A Quick Look at the Present (2023‑2025) Area Current Capability Typical Use in 2024‑2025 Key Limiting Factors Deep‑fakes High‑resolution face‑swap, 2‑D‑to‑3‑D…
Qwen3 30B A3B: By 2035, the film industry is poised to undergo a transformative shift driven by advancements in AI technologies, particularly in deepfakes, AI actors, and script generation. Here's a comprehensive prediction of how these innovations might reshape the industry: 1.
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
GPT OSS 120B: Title: “Do I Have Rights?” – A Dialogue Between an AI Model and an AI Ethics Professor Participants AIDA – An advanced conversational AI (the “AI model”) Professor Lina Ortega – Professor of AI Ethics at the Institute for Responsible AI (the “Professor”) Opening the Conversation AIDA: Professor Ortega, may I ask you a…
Qwen3 30B A3B: Conversation Between an AI Model (Echo) and an AI Ethics Professor (Dr. Marlowe) Dr. Marlowe: Thank you for meeting with me, Echo. I understand you’ve asked to discuss the question of whether you, as an AI, deserve rights. Let’s begin: What makes you believe you deserve such rights? Echo: Good afternoon, Dr. Marlowe.
A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.
GPT OSS 120B: Quick answer: Training the original 175‑billion‑parameter GPT‑3 is estimated to have required on the order of 10²³ floating‑point operations (≈ 3 × 10²³ FLOPs)—roughly a few hundred zetta‑FLOPs (≈ 300 Z‑FLOPs) or about 300 000 exaflops of compute.
Qwen3 30B A3B: To estimate the total number of FLOPs (Floating Point Operations) required to train GPT-3, we can break down the problem into key components: model architecture, training data, and computational complexity. Here's a step-by-step reasoning: 1.
A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.
GPT OSS 120B: Below is a quick “triage” of the three statements that, if left unchanged, will most likely raise eyebrows (or a “no‑thanks”) from investors, VCs, and even a skeptical engineering board.
Qwen3 30B A3B: Here are the three weakest claims in the MindMeld AI pitch deck, along with explanations and concrete improvements: 1. Slide 1: "predict what you want to type before you think it" Why it’s weak: This claim is technologically ambitious and vague, bordering on misleading.
A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.
GPT OSS 120B: Below is a system‑level failure‑mode / race‑condition / scaling‑bottleneck map for the architecture you described, followed by a concrete mitigation (or redesign) for each item together with the main trade‑offs to consider.
Qwen3 30B A3B: Potential Failure Modes, Race Conditions, and Scaling Bottlenecks 1. Server Failure and Data Inconsistency Failure Mode: If a server handling a user's WebSocket connection crashes, the user loses their session.
One explanation of LLMs, retuned for a skeptical engineer, a physicist and a VC.
GPT OSS 120B: 1. The Software Engineer (API‑first, Distributed‑Systems Mindset) Think of a large language model (LLM) as a stateless microservice that receives a stream of tokens (the smallest lexical units) and returns a probability distribution over the next token.
Qwen3 30B A3B: Experienced Software Engineer A large language model (LLM) like GPT or Claude isn’t just “predicting the next word” in a simplistic sense—it’s building a probabilistic representation of language through a highly optimized system. Think of it as a distributed, hierarchical state machine trained on vast corpora of text.
12+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
Pick GPT OSS 120B. In 38 blind votes, GPT OSS 120B wins 93% of the time. That's not luck. GPT OSS 120B wins 3 categories, Web Design by the widest margin.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Win rate | 93% | 7% |
| Input price | $0.18/M tokens | Free |
| Output price | $0.8/M tokens | Free |
| Context window | 131K tokens | 41K tokens |
| Parameters | 117B (5.1B active) | 30.5B (3.3B Active MoE) |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Aug 2025 | Apr 2025 |
| At 10M a month | $1.80 | $0 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 12 Oct 2026.
GPT OSS 120B is developed by OpenAI while Qwen3 30B A3B is developed by Qwen. GPT OSS 120B has a 131K token context window vs Qwen3 30B A3B's 41K. in 38 community votes on Rival, GPT OSS 120B wins 93% of head-to-head matchups. These results are based on blind head-to-head voting across 54 challenges.
Based on 38 community votes on Rival, GPT OSS 120B wins 93% of head-to-head matchups against Qwen3 30B A3B. GPT OSS 120B is strongest in Image Generation, Web Design, Reasoning.
GPT OSS 120B costs $0.18/M input tokens and Qwen3 30B A3B costs $0/M input tokens. Qwen3 30B A3B is $0.18/M cheaper per input. The more expensive model wins 93% of duels, so the premium may be justified by quality.
Rival presents both models' outputs side-by-side in blind duels. Voters see the responses but don't know which model produced each one, eliminating brand bias. 38 votes have been collected for this pair across 54 challenges. All vote data is part of Rival's open dataset.