GPT OSS 120B vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Compare GPT OSS 120B by OpenAI against Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking by Qwen, in 8 community votes, qwen3 next 80b a3b thinking wins 75% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 131K vs 66K, tested across 53 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, GPT OSS 120B or Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking?
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is the better choice overall, winning 75% of 8 blind community votes on Rival. GPT OSS 120B costs $0.18/M input tokens vs $0.15/M for Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking. Context windows: 131K vs 66K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between GPT OSS 120B and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
GPT OSS 120B is made by openai while Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is from qwen. GPT OSS 120B has a 131K token context window compared to Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking's 66K. On pricing, GPT OSS 120B costs $0.18/M input tokens vs $0.15/M for Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking. In community voting, In 8 community votes, Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking wins 75% of head-to-head duels.
In 8 community votes, Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking wins 75% of head-to-head duels. Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking has the edge overall, but performance varies by task type. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 8+ human preference judgments for this pair.
Pick Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking. In 8 blind votes, Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking wins 75% of the time. That's not luck.
Style Comparison
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking uses 3.8x more emoji
vsAsk them anything yourself
Some models write identically. You are paying for the brand.
178 models fingerprinted across 32 writing dimensions. Free research.
185x
price gap between models that write identically
178
models
12
clone pairs
32
dimensions
279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.
We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.
