Granite 4.2 8BvsLlama 3.1 405B
Granite 4.2 8B is cheaper than Llama 3.1 405B at $0.1/M vs $2.7/M input tokens.
| Spec | Granite 4.2 8B | Llama 3.1 405B |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.1/M tokens | $2.7/M tokens |
| Output price | $0.15/M tokens | $3.1/M tokens |
| Context window | 131K tokens | 128K tokens |
| Released | Aug 2026 | Jul 2024 |
Our Verdict
Llama 3.1 405B
Granite 4.2 8BRunner-up
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Llama 3.1 405B has the edge: bigger model tier, major provider backing.
Granite 4.2 8B costs 21x less per token.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Granite 4.2 8B
Input
$0.10
27× cheaper
Output
$0.15
21× cheaper
Llama 3.1 405B
Input
$2.70
Output
$3.10
Granite 4.2 8B is cheaper on both — 27× input, 21× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
57%
Granite 4.2 8B uses 219.5x more bold
Granite 4.2 8B
Llama 3.1 405B
49%Vocabulary55%
18wSentence Length15w
0.42Hedging0.41
2.2Bold0.0
1.9Lists1.9
0.49Emoji0.03
0.11Headings0.00
0.18Transitions0.16
Based on 26 + 5 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
More comparisons
Granite 4.2 8B vs Ox AlphaNew provider
Granite 4.2 8B vs MiniMax M3New provider
Granite 4.2 8B vs Claude Opus 4New provider
Granite 4.2 8B vs Claude Opus 4.1New provider
Llama 3.1 405B vs Qwen3 Coder NextNew provider
Granite 4.2 8B vs Qwen3 Coder PlusNew provider
Llama 3.1 405B vs Qwen3 MaxNew provider
Llama 3.1 405B vs Qwen3 Max ThinkingNew provider