Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Granite 4.2 8BvsQwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
Updated Aug 2026

Granite 4.2 8BvsQwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct

Granite 4.2 8B is cheaper than Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct at $0.1/M vs $0.15/M input tokens.

Granite 4.2 8B and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct compared across 54 shared prompts
SpecGranite 4.2 8BQwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
Input price$0.1/M tokens$0.15/M tokens
Output price$0.15/M tokens$1.5/M tokens
Context window131K tokens66K tokens
WeightsOpenOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedAug 2026Sep 2025
Our Verdict
Granite 4.2 8B
Granite 4.2 8B
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

Granite 4.2 8B costs 10x less per token.

Too close to call
API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Granite 4.2 8B
Input
$0.10
1.5× cheaper
Output
$0.15
10× cheaper
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
Input
$0.15
Output
$1.50

Granite 4.2 8B is cheaper on both: 1.5× input, 10× output.

Where to run it

7 hosts, cheapest first

Granite 4.2 8B2 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
DDeepInfrabf16$0.06 in·$0.25 out·131k·100% upCCoreWeavebf16$0.10 in·$0.15 out·131k·100% up
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct5 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
DDeepInfrafp8$0.09 in·$1.10 out·262k·99.2% upAlibaba Cloud$0.10 in·$0.78 out·131k·100% upPParasailfp8$0.10 in·$1.10 out·262k·100% upGoogle Vertex AI$0.15 in·$1.20 out·262k·100% upNNovitabf16$0.15 in·$1.50 out·131k·99.9% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 9 Sep 2026.

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
47%

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct uses 8.1x more headings

Granite 4.2 8B
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
49%Vocabulary54%
18wSentence Length18w
0.42Hedging0.33
2.2Bold5.6
1.9Lists3.7
0.49Emoji1.01
0.11Headings0.91
0.18Transitions0.10
Based on 26 + 27 text responses
Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct logoOx Alpha logo
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct vs Ox AlphaNew provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct logoMiniMax M3 logo
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct vs MiniMax M3New provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct logoMiniMax M2.7 logo
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct vs MiniMax M2.7New provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct logoAurora Alpha logo
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct vs Aurora AlphaNew provider
Granite 4.2 8B logoGrok Code Fast 1 logo
Granite 4.2 8B vs Grok Code Fast 1New provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct logoHealer Alpha logo
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct vs Healer AlphaNew provider
Granite 4.2 8B logoHorizon Alpha logo
Granite 4.2 8B vs Horizon AlphaNew provider
Granite 4.2 8B logoHorizon Beta logo
Granite 4.2 8B vs Horizon BetaNew provider
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed