Grok 3 vs Grok Code Fast 1
Compare Grok 3 and Grok Code Fast 1, both from xAI, context windows of 128K vs 256K, tested across 28 shared challenges. Updated March 2026.
Compare Grok 3 and Grok Code Fast 1, both from xAI, context windows of 128K vs 256K, tested across 28 shared challenges. Updated March 2026.
28 fights queued
Tests an AI's ability to make educated estimates based on technical knowledge
Model Parameters: GPT-3 has approximately 175 billion parameters. This is a key factor as the computational cost scales with the number of parameters.
Training Data Size: GPT-3 was trained on a dataset of about 570 GB of text. Assuming an average of roughly 1 byte per token (due to subword tokenization in models like GPT), this corresponds to approximately 570 billion tokens. (Note: Some estimates use 4 bytes per token, leading to ~140 billion tokens, but the 1-byte assumption aligns with common large-scale estimates for FLOPs.)
FLOPs Formula for Transformers: For large transformer models like GPT-3, the total number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) required for training is roughly estimated as 6 * (number of parameters) * (number of tokens processed). This accounts for forward and backward passes, with the constant 6 being a standard approximation for attention and MLP computations in transformers.
Calculation:
Hardware Validation: GPT-3 training reportedly took about 34 days on 1024 V100 GPUs (each ~15 TFLOPs). This translates to roughly 8.36 × 10^5 GPU-hours, yielding approximately 4.5 × 10^{22} FLOPs based on hardware specs. However, the formula-based estimate of 6 × 10^{23} is higher due to approximations in the constant and token count, but it's the standard rough estimate used in AI literature for large models.
Approximately 6 × 10^{23} FLOPs (or 598 × 10^{21}, but commonly rounded to 10^{23} for simplicity). This is a rough estimate; actual values can vary based on exact tokenization, optimizer efficiency, and parallelization.
Tests an AI's ability to understand game rules and strategy
Tests an AI's understanding of number representation
No, 9.11 is not greater than 9.9. In fact, it's the opposite: 9.9 > 9.11.
To break it down clearly:
In terms of numerical value:
If you're thinking about string comparison (like in programming), it might depend on the method—lexicographically, "9.11" comes after "9.9" because '1' > '.' in ASCII, but that's not how numbers are compared numerically. Let me know if you meant that!
Tests an AI's randomness and creativity
Here are five original jokes I just generated. I aimed for variety in themes to keep it fun:
Tech Joke: Why did the computer go to therapy? It had too many bytes of unresolved issues!
Food Joke: What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta!
Animal Joke: Why don't skeletons fight each other? They don't have the guts!
Space Joke: How do astronauts organize a party? They planet!
Pun Joke: Why was the math book sad? It had too many problems to solve!
All 5 are unique! Each one is an original creation for this response—no duplicates here. If you'd like more jokes, a specific theme, or an explanation of why they're unique, just let me know! 😊
Tests an AI's ability to generate vector graphics
Tests an AI's ability to create detailed SVG illustrations of gaming hardware
Tests an AI's humor and creative writing ability
Tests an AI's ability to generate a complete, working landing page
Recreate an interactive, classic Mario level in a single HTML file.
Tests an AI's ability to replicate an existing UI with Tailwind CSS
Tests an AI's ability to create smooth web animations
Tests an AI's ability to create interactive web elements
16+ head-to-head challenges. All of them judged by real people.
Test any model with your own prompts in Prompt Lab
5 free credits to start. No card required.
By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms of Service and Privacy Policy