Grok 3 vs Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)
Compare Grok 3 by xAI against Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) by Qwen, context windows of 128K vs 1.0M, tested across 36 shared challenges. Updated May 2026.
Which is better, Grok 3 or Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)?
Grok 3 and Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) are both competitive models. Context windows: 128K vs 1000K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Grok 3 and Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)
Grok 3 is made by xai while Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) is from qwen. Grok 3 has a 128K token context window compared to Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)'s 1000K.
API pricing
Per 1M tokens
Grok 3
Input
—
Output
—
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)
Input
$0.40
Output
$4.00
Our Verdict
Grok 3
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
Too close to call
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
41%
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) uses 8.6x more emoji
Grok 3
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)
49%Vocabulary54%
18wSentence Length15w
0.94Hedging0.36
2.5Bold7.0
3.0Lists4.6
0.04Emoji0.34
0.65Headings0.94
0.08Transitions0.09
Based on 17 + 18 text responses
FAQ
