xAI: Grok 4 Fast (free) vs Claude Sonnet 4

Compare xAI: Grok 4 Fast (free) by xAI against Claude Sonnet 4 by Anthropic, context windows of 2.0M vs 200K, tested across 20 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.

Which is better, xAI: Grok 4 Fast (free) or Claude Sonnet 4?

xAI: Grok 4 Fast (free) and Claude Sonnet 4 are both competitive models. xAI: Grok 4 Fast (free) costs $0/M input tokens vs $3/M for Claude Sonnet 4. Context windows: 2000K vs 200K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between xAI: Grok 4 Fast (free) and Claude Sonnet 4

xAI: Grok 4 Fast (free) is made by xai while Claude Sonnet 4 is from anthropic. xAI: Grok 4 Fast (free) has a 2000K token context window compared to Claude Sonnet 4's 200K. On pricing, xAI: Grok 4 Fast (free) costs $0/M input tokens vs $3/M for Claude Sonnet 4.

Our Verdict
xAI: Grok 4 Fast (free)
xAI: Grok 4 Fast (free)
Claude Sonnet 4
Claude Sonnet 4Runner-up

No community votes yet. On paper, xAI: Grok 4 Fast (free) has the edge — newer, bigger context window.

Too close to call
Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
79%

Claude Sonnet 4 uses 87.9x more emoji

xAI: Grok 4 Fast (free)
Claude Sonnet 4
65%Vocabulary62%
13wSentence Length111w
0.56Hedging0.40
1.4Bold5.0
2.5Lists9.3
0.00Emoji0.88
1.58Headings2.16
0.28Transitions0.33
Based on 14 + 17 text responses
vs

Ask them anything yourself

xAI: Grok 4 Fast (free)Claude Sonnet 4

279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.

We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.

AI Hallucination Index 2026
Free preview13 of 58 slides
FAQ

Common questions