What is the difference between Grok 4.1 Fast and Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)?

Grok 4.1 Fast is developed by xAI while Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) is developed by Qwen. You can compare their actual outputs across 37 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, Grok 4.1 Fast or Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)?

It depends on your use case. Grok 4.1 Fast and Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 37 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How can I compare Grok 4.1 Fast and Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Grok 4.1 Fast and Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

What is the difference between Grok 4.1 Fast and Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)?

Grok 4.1 Fast is developed by xAI while Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) is developed by Qwen. You can compare their actual outputs across 37 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, Grok 4.1 Fast or Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)?

It depends on your use case. Grok 4.1 Fast and Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 37 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How can I compare Grok 4.1 Fast and Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Grok 4.1 Fast and Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Grok 4.1 Fast vs Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking): Which Is Better?

Updated Nov 2025

Our Verdict

Grok 4.1 Fast

Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)Runner-up

No community votes yet. On paper, Grok 4.1 Fast has the edge — bigger model tier, newer, major provider backing.

Slight edge

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Grok 4.1 Fast

Input

—

Output

—

Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)

Input

$0.40

Output

$4.00

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity

55%

Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) uses 34.0x more emoji

Grok 4.1 Fast

Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)

67%Vocabulary54%

15wSentence Length15w

0.17Hedging0.36

4.7Bold7.0

3.7Lists4.6

0.00Emoji0.34

0.99Headings0.94

0.14Transitions0.09

Based on 24 + 18 text responses

Research

What we learned reading every model

Grok 4.1 Fast and Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) have opinions about your brand too.Ask 10 models what they tell people about you. Verbatim receipts.Run the mirror

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) vs MiniMax M3New provider

Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) vs OpenAI o3New provider

Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) vs Llama 4 MaverickNew provider

Updated Nov 2025

Our Verdict

Grok 4.1 Fast

Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)Runner-up

No community votes yet. On paper, Grok 4.1 Fast has the edge — bigger model tier, newer, major provider backing.

Slight edge

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Grok 4.1 Fast

Input

—

Output

—

Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)

Input

$0.40

Output

$4.00

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity

55%

Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) uses 34.0x more emoji

Grok 4.1 Fast

Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)

67%Vocabulary54%

15wSentence Length15w

0.17Hedging0.36

4.7Bold7.0

3.7Lists4.6

0.00Emoji0.34

0.99Headings0.94

0.14Transitions0.09

Based on 24 + 18 text responses

Research

What we learned reading every model

Grok 4.1 Fast and Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) have opinions about your brand too.Ask 10 models what they tell people about you. Verbatim receipts.Run the mirror

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) vs MiniMax M3New provider

Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) vs OpenAI o3New provider

Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) vs Llama 4 MaverickNew provider