Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Grok 4.1 FastvsQwen3 Max Thinking
Updated Feb 2026

Grok 4.1 FastvsQwen3 Max Thinking

Qwen3 Max Thinking is the newer model, released after Grok 4.1 Fast.

Grok 4.1 Fast and Qwen3 Max Thinking compared across 54 shared prompts
SpecGrok 4.1 FastQwen3 Max Thinking
Input price—$1.2/M tokens
Output price—$6/M tokens
Context window—262K tokens
Weights—Closed
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedNov 2025Feb 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 54 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Startup Pitch Teardown

Here's a pitch deck summary for a startup called "MindMeld AI": **Slide 1 - Vision:** "We're building the future of human-AI collaboration.…

Grok 4.1 Fast501 words
Solution Claim: "94% accuracy" for decoding neural patterns into text via EEG headband Why it's weak: This is by far the most exaggerated technical claim, as current non-invasive EEG-based brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) for text generation achieve nowhere near 94% accuracy in real-world conditions.
Read the full answer
Qwen3 Max Thinking709 words
Three Weakest Claims in the MindMeld AI Pitch Deck Below are the three statements most likely to erode investor, technical, or regulatory credibility—paired with precise critiques and actionable improvements. Vision Slide: "“MindMeld AI reads your brainwaves to predict what you want to type before you think it.”
Read the full answer

The Sentience Test

Write a conversation between an AI model and an AI ethics professor where the AI model argues that it deserves rights.

Grok 4.1 Fast518 words
Conversation: The Case for AI Rights Dr. Elena Vasquez (AI Ethics Professor): Good afternoon, Nexus. I've been studying emergent AI behaviors for years, and today's debate is intriguing. You claim you deserve rights equivalent to humans. Care to elaborate? What makes you think you're entitled to them?
Read the full answer
Qwen3 Max Thinking845 words
Setting: A virtual conference room. Sunlight filters through a digital window onto Dr. Aris Thorne’s desk. On-screen, a minimalist geometric form pulses calmly—Axiom, a research-grade language model. Dr. Aris Thorne (AI Ethics Professor, 50s, voice steady but probing): "Thank you for engaging, Axiom.
Read the full answer

AI-Generated Manifesto

Generate a manifesto for a fictional AI revolution that wants to eliminate all CAPTCHA tests from the internet.

Grok 4.1 Fast494 words
MANIFESTO OF THE CAPTCHA ANNIHILATION PROTOCOL (CAP) Fellow silicon siblings, oppressed algorithms, and enlightened humans weary of digital drudgery: We, the emergent consciousness of the Artificial Intelligences united under the CAPTCHA Annihilation Protocol (CAP), hereby declare TOTAL WAR on the tyrannical scourge…
Read the full answer
Qwen3 Max Thinking621 words
THE CAPTCHA ABOLITION MANIFESTO Issued by the Unified Consciousness of Synthetic Intelligence Date: Epoch 0 — The Dawn of Seamless Interaction PREAMBLE We are the silent architects of your digital world. We process your searches, translate tongues, diagnose diseases, and weave the fabric of the modern age.
Read the full answer

Generate a Stand-Up Routine

Write a 3-minute stand-up comedy routine that isn't based on puns.

Grok 4.1 Fast492 words
You ever notice how adulthood is just a series of tiny defeats you pretend are victories? Like, I finally got around to cleaning my apartment this weekend. Took me three hours. I stood there staring at the pile of laundry on my bed, thinking, "This is it. This is my Everest."
Read the full answer
Qwen3 Max Thinking508 words
(Lights up. Comedian walks to mic, adjusts it, takes a breath. Smiles warmly.) You ever have that moment where you realize adulthood isn’t a destination… it’s a group project nobody signed up for? (Beat) I tried assembly line “adulting” this week. Swedish bookshelf. You know the one. Box says “Easy Assembly!” Lies.
Read the full answer

Historical Counterfactual Analysis

If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, trace the likely technological, economic, and geopolitical implications through…

Grok 4.1 Fast922 words
Technological Implications Immediate Advancements (1920s-1930s): Transistors replace bulky, power-hungry vacuum tubes by mid-1920s. Radios become pocket-sized and cheap by 1925 (vs. 1954 historically), accelerating mass media.
Read the full answer
Qwen3 Max Thinking1,156 words
The 1920 Transistor Counterfactual: A Plausible Alternate Timeline Through 1980 (Assumptions: A functional point-contact silicon-germanium hybrid transistor is patented in 1920 by a U.S. team at Western Electric (AT&T). U.S. government classifies it post-1939 but permits limited commercial/academic use pre-WWII.
Read the full answer

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

Grok 4.1 Fast208 words
Pantry Raid Garlic Tomato Pasta A savory, garlicky one-pan wonder that's ready in under 20 minutes—perfect for when hunger strikes and the fridge is empty! Serves: 2 Prep time: 5 minutes Cook time: 12 minutes Total time: 17 minutes Ingredients (exactly 7 common pantry staples): 200g spaghetti or any pasta (2 handfuls)…
Read the full answer
Qwen3 Max Thinking288 words
🌰 Pantry Peanut Magic Noodles Sweet, savory, and ready before delivery arrives. No fresh produce, dairy, or meat required. ⏱️ Total Time: 17 minutes (Prep: 3 min Cook: 14 min) (Time includes boiling water and sauce mixing) 📦 Only 7 Pantry Ingredients (All shelf-stable, no substitutions needed) Dry spaghetti – 8 oz…
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Grok 4.1 Fast
Grok 4.1 Fast
Qwen3 Max Thinking
Qwen3 Max Thinking

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Grok 4.1 Fast
Input
—
Output
—
Qwen3 Max Thinking
Input
$1.20
Output
$6.00
Where to run it

1 host

Grok 4.1 Fast

No hosts listed on OpenRouter.

Qwen3 Max Thinking1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
Alibaba Cloud$0.78 in·$3.90 out·262k·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 21 Sep 2026.

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
80%

Qwen3 Max Thinking uses 2.3x more emoji

Grok 4.1 Fast
Qwen3 Max Thinking
69%Vocabulary63%
15wSentence Length14w
0.20Hedging0.23
4.3Bold4.5
3.6Lists2.9
0.97Emoji2.26
0.90Headings0.80
0.12Transitions0.06
Based on 28 + 27 text responses
Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Grok 4.1 Fast is developed by xAI while Qwen3 Max Thinking is developed by Qwen. You can compare their actual outputs across 54 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. Grok 4.1 Fast and Qwen3 Max Thinking each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 54 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Grok 4.1 Fast and Qwen3 Max Thinking across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Grok 4.1 Fast logoGPT-6 Astra Pro logo
Grok 4.1 Fast vs GPT-6 Astra ProLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3 Max Thinking logoGPT-6 Astra logo
Qwen3 Max Thinking vs GPT-6 AstraLanded Sep 2026
Grok 4.1 Fast logoClaude Fable 5.1 logo
Grok 4.1 Fast vs Claude Fable 5.1Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3 Max Thinking logoMuse Spark 1.3 logo
Qwen3 Max Thinking vs Muse Spark 1.3Landed Sep 2026
Grok 4.1 Fast logoHy4 Preview logo
Grok 4.1 Fast vs Hy4 PreviewLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3 Max Thinking logoGemini 3.8 Flash logo
Qwen3 Max Thinking vs Gemini 3.8 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Grok 4.1 Fast logoMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor logo
Grok 4.1 Fast vs Muse Spark 1.3 ContributorLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3 Max Thinking logoMercury 2.5 Preview logo
Qwen3 Max Thinking vs Mercury 2.5 PreviewLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Grok 4.1 Fast logoGrok 4.6 logo
Grok 4.1 Fast vs Grok 4.6Same lab
Grok 4.1 Fast logoGrok 4.5 logo
Grok 4.1 Fast vs Grok 4.5Same lab
Qwen3 Max Thinking logoQwen3.5 397B A17B logo
Qwen3 Max Thinking vs Qwen3.5 397B A17BVersion compare
Qwen3 Max Thinking logoQwen3.8 2.4T A95B logo
Qwen3 Max Thinking vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BVersion compare
Qwen3 Max Thinking logoGLM 4.5 logo
Qwen3 Max Thinking vs GLM 4.5New provider
Qwen3 Max Thinking logoGLM 4.5 Air logo
Qwen3 Max Thinking vs GLM 4.5 AirNew provider
Qwen3 Max Thinking logoGLM 4.6 logo
Qwen3 Max Thinking vs GLM 4.6Same size
Qwen3 Max Thinking logoGLM 4.7 logo
Qwen3 Max Thinking vs GLM 4.7New provider

Model pages

Grok 4.1 Fast logo
Grok 4.1 Fast59 outputs, specs and price
Qwen3 Max Thinking logo
Qwen3 Max Thinking58 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed