Grok 4vsLing 2.6 1T
Ling 2.6 1T is cheaper than Grok 4 at $0/M vs $3/M input tokens.
| Spec | Grok 4 | Ling 2.6 1T |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $3/M tokens | Free |
| Output price | $15/M tokens | Free |
| Context window | 256K tokens | 262K tokens |
| Weights | — | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Jul 2025 | Apr 2026 |
Our Verdict
Ling 2.6 1T
Grok 4Runner-up
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Ling 2.6 1T has the edge: bigger model tier, newer.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Grok 4
Input
$3.00
Output
$15.00
Ling 2.6 1T
Input
$0.000
Output
$0.000
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
57%
Grok 4 uses 59.8x more emoji
Grok 4
Ling 2.6 1T
56%Vocabulary55%
18wSentence Length17w
0.65Hedging0.33
2.4Bold1.9
2.4Lists4.1
0.60Emoji0.00
0.73Headings0.41
0.06Transitions0.04
Based on 26 + 27 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
More comparisons
Ling 2.6 1T vs Ox AlphaNew provider
Ling 2.6 1T vs MiniMax M3New provider
Ling 2.6 1T vs Claude Opus 4New provider
Ling 2.6 1T vs Claude Opus 4.1New provider
Ling 2.6 1T vs Qwen3.5 122B A10BNew provider
Ling 2.6 1T vs Qwen3.5 27BNew provider
Ling 2.6 1T vs Qwen3.5 35B A3BNew provider
Ling 2.6 1T vs Qwen3.5 397B A17BNew provider