What is the difference between Thinking Machines: Inkling and Llama 3.1 405B?

Thinking Machines: Inkling is developed by Thinking Machines while Llama 3.1 405B is developed by Meta AI. Thinking Machines: Inkling has a 1.0M token context window vs Llama 3.1 405B's 128K. You can compare their actual outputs across 12 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, Thinking Machines: Inkling or Llama 3.1 405B?

It depends on your use case. Thinking Machines: Inkling and Llama 3.1 405B each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 12 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does Thinking Machines: Inkling cost compared to Llama 3.1 405B?

Thinking Machines: Inkling costs $1/M input tokens and Llama 3.1 405B costs $2.7/M input tokens. Thinking Machines: Inkling is $1.70/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare Thinking Machines: Inkling and Llama 3.1 405B on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Thinking Machines: Inkling and Llama 3.1 405B across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

What is the difference between Thinking Machines: Inkling and Llama 3.1 405B?

Thinking Machines: Inkling is developed by Thinking Machines while Llama 3.1 405B is developed by Meta AI. Thinking Machines: Inkling has a 1.0M token context window vs Llama 3.1 405B's 128K. You can compare their actual outputs across 12 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, Thinking Machines: Inkling or Llama 3.1 405B?

It depends on your use case. Thinking Machines: Inkling and Llama 3.1 405B each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 12 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does Thinking Machines: Inkling cost compared to Llama 3.1 405B?

Thinking Machines: Inkling costs $1/M input tokens and Llama 3.1 405B costs $2.7/M input tokens. Thinking Machines: Inkling is $1.70/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare Thinking Machines: Inkling and Llama 3.1 405B on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Thinking Machines: Inkling and Llama 3.1 405B across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Thinking Machines: Inkling vs Llama 3.1 405B: Which Is Better?

Updated Jul 2026

Our Verdict

Thinking Machines: Inkling

Llama 3.1 405B

No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.

Too close to call

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Thinking Machines: Inkling

Input

$1.00

2.7× cheaper

Output

$4.05

Llama 3.1 405B

Input

$2.70

Output

$3.10

1.3× cheaper

Thinking Machines: Inkling wins input (2.7× cheaper)·Llama 3.1 405B wins output (1.3× cheaper)

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity

50%

Thinking Machines: Inkling uses 496.8x more bold

Thinking Machines: Inkling

Llama 3.1 405B

57%Vocabulary56%

19wSentence Length15w

0.30Hedging0.41

5.0Bold0.0

2.7Lists1.9

0.04Emoji0.03

0.49Headings0.00

0.06Transitions0.16

Based on 27 + 5 text responses

Research

What we learned reading every model

Thinking Machines: Inkling and Llama 3.1 405B have opinions about your brand too.Ask 10 models what they tell people about you. Verbatim receipts.Run the mirror

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Llama 3.1 405B vs MiniMax M3New provider

Llama 3.1 405B vs GPT-5New provider

Thinking Machines: Inkling vs Llama 4 MaverickCross-provider

Updated Jul 2026

Our Verdict

Thinking Machines: Inkling

Llama 3.1 405B

No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.

Too close to call

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Thinking Machines: Inkling

Input

$1.00

2.7× cheaper

Output

$4.05

Llama 3.1 405B

Input

$2.70

Output

$3.10

1.3× cheaper

Thinking Machines: Inkling wins input (2.7× cheaper)·Llama 3.1 405B wins output (1.3× cheaper)

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity

50%

Thinking Machines: Inkling uses 496.8x more bold

Thinking Machines: Inkling

Llama 3.1 405B

57%Vocabulary56%

19wSentence Length15w

0.30Hedging0.41

5.0Bold0.0

2.7Lists1.9

0.04Emoji0.03

0.49Headings0.00

0.06Transitions0.16

Based on 27 + 5 text responses

Research

What we learned reading every model

Thinking Machines: Inkling and Llama 3.1 405B have opinions about your brand too.Ask 10 models what they tell people about you. Verbatim receipts.Run the mirror

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Llama 3.1 405B vs MiniMax M3New provider

Llama 3.1 405B vs GPT-5New provider

Thinking Machines: Inkling vs Llama 4 MaverickCross-provider