What is the difference between Thinking Machines: Inkling and Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

Thinking Machines: Inkling is developed by Thinking Machines while Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B is developed by Qwen. Thinking Machines: Inkling has a 1.0M token context window vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B's 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, Thinking Machines: Inkling or Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

It depends on your use case. Thinking Machines: Inkling and Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does Thinking Machines: Inkling cost compared to Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

Thinking Machines: Inkling costs $1/M input tokens and Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B costs $0.6/M input tokens. Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B is $0.40/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare Thinking Machines: Inkling and Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Thinking Machines: Inkling and Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

What is the difference between Thinking Machines: Inkling and Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

Thinking Machines: Inkling is developed by Thinking Machines while Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B is developed by Qwen. Thinking Machines: Inkling has a 1.0M token context window vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B's 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, Thinking Machines: Inkling or Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

It depends on your use case. Thinking Machines: Inkling and Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does Thinking Machines: Inkling cost compared to Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

Thinking Machines: Inkling costs $1/M input tokens and Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B costs $0.6/M input tokens. Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B is $0.40/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare Thinking Machines: Inkling and Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Thinking Machines: Inkling and Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Thinking Machines: Inkling vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B: Which Is Better?

Updated Jul 2026

Our Verdict

Thinking Machines: Inkling

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17BRunner-up

No community votes yet. On paper, Thinking Machines: Inkling has the edge — newer, bigger context window.

Too close to call

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Thinking Machines: Inkling

Input

$1.00

Output

$4.05

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Input

$0.60

1.7× cheaper

Output

$3.60

1.1× cheaper

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B is cheaper on both — 1.7× input, 1.1× output

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity

49%

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B uses 5.9x more emoji

Thinking Machines: Inkling

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B

57%Vocabulary54%

19wSentence Length14w

0.30Hedging0.39

5.0Bold6.9

2.7Lists4.2

0.04Emoji0.23

0.49Headings0.93

0.06Transitions0.17

Based on 27 + 23 text responses

Research

What we learned reading every model

Thinking Machines: Inkling and Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B have opinions about your brand too.Ask 10 models what they tell people about you. Verbatim receipts.Run the mirror

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Thinking Machines: Inkling vs MiniMax M3New provider

Thinking Machines: Inkling vs GPT-5New provider

Thinking Machines: Inkling vs Llama 4 MaverickNew provider

Updated Jul 2026

Our Verdict

Thinking Machines: Inkling

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17BRunner-up

No community votes yet. On paper, Thinking Machines: Inkling has the edge — newer, bigger context window.

Too close to call

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Thinking Machines: Inkling

Input

$1.00

Output

$4.05

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Input

$0.60

1.7× cheaper

Output

$3.60

1.1× cheaper

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B is cheaper on both — 1.7× input, 1.1× output

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity

49%

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B uses 5.9x more emoji

Thinking Machines: Inkling

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B

57%Vocabulary54%

19wSentence Length14w

0.30Hedging0.39

5.0Bold6.9

2.7Lists4.2

0.04Emoji0.23

0.49Headings0.93

0.06Transitions0.17

Based on 27 + 23 text responses

Research

What we learned reading every model

Thinking Machines: Inkling and Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B have opinions about your brand too.Ask 10 models what they tell people about you. Verbatim receipts.Run the mirror

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Thinking Machines: Inkling vs MiniMax M3New provider

Thinking Machines: Inkling vs GPT-5New provider

Thinking Machines: Inkling vs Llama 4 MaverickNew provider