Kimi Linear 48B A3B InstructvsQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 is cheaper than Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct at $0.2/M vs $0.3/M input tokens.
| Spec | Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.3/M tokens | $0.2/M tokens |
| Output price | $0.6/M tokens | $0.8/M tokens |
| Context window | 1.0M tokens | 131K tokens |
| Released | Nov 2025 | Jul 2025 |
Our Verdict
Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Runner-up
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.
Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct takes Reasoning.
Slight edge
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct
Input
$0.30
Output
$0.60
1.3× cheaper
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Input
$0.20
1.5× cheaper
Output
$0.80
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 wins input (1.5× cheaper)·Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct wins output (1.3× cheaper)
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
46%
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 uses 103.6x more emoji
Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
63%Vocabulary55%
15wSentence Length18w
0.19Hedging0.52
5.2Bold6.7
3.2Lists4.3
0.00Emoji1.04
0.38Headings0.92
0.05Transitions0.11
Based on 14 + 22 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
More comparisons
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs MiniMax M3New provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs Ox AlphaNew provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs Claude Opus 4New provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs Claude Opus 4.1New provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)New provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs Llama 4 MaverickNew provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs Llama 4 ScoutNew provider
Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct vs MercuryNew provider