Llama 3.1 405B vs Inception: Mercury
Compare Llama 3.1 405B by Meta AI against Inception: Mercury by Inception, context windows of 128K vs 32K, tested across 12 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
Llama 3.1 405B
Inception: MercuryRunner-up
No community votes yet. On paper, Llama 3.1 405B has the edge — bigger model tier, bigger context window, major provider backing.
Llama 3.1 405B is 3.2x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Llama 3.1 405B
Input
$2.70
3.7× cheaper
Output
$3.10
3.2× cheaper
Inception: Mercury
Input
$10.00
Output
$10.00
Llama 3.1 405B is cheaper on both — 3.7× input, 3.2× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
48%
Inception: Mercury uses 489.0x more bold
Llama 3.1 405B
Inception: Mercury
56%Vocabulary55%
15wSentence Length40w
0.41Hedging0.39
0.0Bold4.9
1.9Lists3.8
0.03Emoji0.04
0.00Headings1.04
0.16Transitions0.03
Based on 5 + 17 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
