Llama 3.1 405B vs MiniMax M1

Compare Llama 3.1 405B by Meta AI against MiniMax M1 by MiniMax, context windows of 128K vs 1.0M, tested across 5 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.

Which is better, Llama 3.1 405B or MiniMax M1?

Llama 3.1 405B and MiniMax M1 are both competitive models. Llama 3.1 405B costs $2.7/M input tokens vs $0.3/M for MiniMax M1. Context windows: 128K vs 1000K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between Llama 3.1 405B and MiniMax M1

Llama 3.1 405B is made by meta while MiniMax M1 is from minimax. Llama 3.1 405B has a 128K token context window compared to MiniMax M1's 1000K. On pricing, Llama 3.1 405B costs $2.7/M input tokens vs $0.3/M for MiniMax M1.

Our Verdict
Llama 3.1 405B
Llama 3.1 405B
MiniMax M1
MiniMax M1

No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.

Too close to call
Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
43%

MiniMax M1 uses 743.5x more bold

Llama 3.1 405B
MiniMax M1
56%Vocabulary53%
15wSentence Length17w
0.41Hedging0.51
0.0Bold7.4
1.9Lists6.2
0.03Emoji0.10
0.00Headings0.86
0.16Transitions0.03
Based on 5 + 14 text responses
vs

Ask them anything yourself

Llama 3.1 405BMiniMax M1

279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.

We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.

AI Hallucination Index 2026
Free preview13 of 58 slides
FAQ

Common questions