Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) vs Gemini Pro 1.0

Compare Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) by Meta AI against Gemini Pro 1.0 by Google AI, context windows of 128K vs 33K, tested across 13 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.

Which is better, Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) or Gemini Pro 1.0?

Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) and Gemini Pro 1.0 are both competitive models. Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) costs $0.59/M input tokens vs $0.5/M for Gemini Pro 1.0. Context windows: 128K vs 33K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) and Gemini Pro 1.0

Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) is made by meta while Gemini Pro 1.0 is from google. Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) has a 128K token context window compared to Gemini Pro 1.0's 33K. On pricing, Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) costs $0.59/M input tokens vs $0.5/M for Gemini Pro 1.0.

Our Verdict
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)
Gemini Pro 1.0
Gemini Pro 1.0Runner-up

No community votes yet. On paper, Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) has the edge — newer, bigger context window.

Too close to call
Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
100%

Gemini Pro 1.0 uses 45.9x more headings

Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)
Gemini Pro 1.0
51%Vocabulary61%
18wSentence Length13w
0.46Hedging0.41
3.4Bold5.3
5.6Lists5.4
0.00Emoji0.00
0.00Headings0.46
0.06Transitions0.38
Based on 15 + 13 text responses
vs

Ask them anything yourself

Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)Gemini Pro 1.0

279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.

We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.

AI Hallucination Index 2026
Free preview13 of 58 slides
FAQ

Common questions