What is the difference between Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) and GPT-4o (Omni)?

Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) is developed by Meta AI while GPT-4o (Omni) is developed by OpenAI. Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) has a 128K token context window vs GPT-4o (Omni)'s 128K. You can compare their actual outputs across 26 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) or GPT-4o (Omni)?

It depends on your use case. Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) and GPT-4o (Omni) each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 26 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) cost compared to GPT-4o (Omni)?

Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) costs $0.59/M input tokens and GPT-4o (Omni) costs $2.5/M input tokens. Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) is $1.91/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) and GPT-4o (Omni) on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) and GPT-4o (Omni) across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output, and Pro users can create custom challenges to test both models with their own prompts.

Rival

Updated Jul 23, 2024

Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)vsGPT-4o (Omni)

26 fights queued

Why Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)?

9.9x cheaper overall$0.59/M in · $0.79/M out

2 months newerJul 2024

Why GPT-4o (Omni)?

Leads 4 of 4 benchmarks

Stronger on GPQA53.1% vs 46.7%

Favorites

Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)GPT-4o (Omni)

Movie

Blade Runner

19827.9

Inception

20108.4

Album

OK Computer

Radiohead

Dark Side Of The Moon

suisside

Book

Nineteen Eighty-Four

George Orwell

To Kill a Mockingbird

Harper Lee

City

Reykjavik

Iceland

Kyoto

Japan

Game

The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time

Adventure, Action4.4

The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild

Adventure, Action4.5

6 / 26

Logic Puzzlereasoning

Tests an AI's ability to solve a simple but potentially confusing logic puzzle

Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)

Meta · Jul 2024text

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

GPT-4o (Omni)

Openai · May 2024text

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

Vote

2 / 26

Stochastic Consistency Testanalysis

Tests an AI's randomness and creativity

Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)

Meta · Jul 2024text

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

GPT-4o (Omni)

Openai · May 2024text

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

Vote

3 / 26

Xbox Controller SVG Artimage generation

Tests an AI's ability to create detailed SVG illustrations of gaming hardware

Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)

Meta · Jul 2024website

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

GPT-4o (Omni)

Openai · May 2024svg

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

Vote

4 / 26

Realistic AI Interviewconversation

Tests an AI's ability to simulate personalities and predict future trends

Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)

Meta · Jul 2024text

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

GPT-4o (Omni)

Openai · May 2024text

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

Vote

5 / 26

Satirical Fake News Headlineconversation

Tests an AI's humor and understanding of current events

Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)

Meta · Jul 2024text

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

GPT-4o (Omni)

Openai · May 2024text

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

Vote

6 / 26

Minimalist Landing Pageweb design

Tests an AI's ability to generate a complete, working landing page

Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)

Meta · Jul 2024website

Try this prompt

GPT-4o (Omni)

Openai · May 2024website

Try this prompt

Vote

This matchup has more rounds

20+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.

$0No card. No catch. Just a login.

Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy Policy

Find Your Model

Static demos are useful. Your prompt matters more.

Run this matchup on your actual task. 30 seconds. No card.

Can you tell Claude from GPT?

Run your prompt blind. Judge outputs, not logos.

Take the blind test

Our Verdict

Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)

GPT-4o (Omni)

No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.

Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) is 13x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.

Too close to call

These are our prompts. Yours will tell you more.

Run Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) vs GPT-4o (Omni) on your actual task. 5 free credits. No card.

Test with your prompt

FAQ

Keep going

GPT-4o (Omni) vs Llama 4 MaverickCross-provider

Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) vs GPT-5Cross-provider

Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) vs MiniMax M2.5New provider

This comparison gets 800+ views/month. Your brand could be here.

Advertise

Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) vs GPT-4o (Omni)

Which is better, Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) or GPT-4o (Omni)?