Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)
Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) vs Llama 4 Maverick
Compare Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) and Llama 4 Maverick, both from Meta AI, context windows of 128K vs 1.0M, tested across 26 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) or Llama 4 Maverick?
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) and Llama 4 Maverick are both competitive models. Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) costs $0.59/M input tokens vs $1.5/M for Llama 4 Maverick. Context windows: 128K vs 1000K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) and Llama 4 Maverick
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) is made by meta while Llama 4 Maverick is from meta. Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) has a 128K token context window compared to Llama 4 Maverick's 1000K. On pricing, Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) costs $0.59/M input tokens vs $1.5/M for Llama 4 Maverick.
Our Verdict
Llama 4 Maverick
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)Runner-up
No community votes yet. On paper, Llama 4 Maverick has the edge — bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) is 3.2x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Slight edge
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
82%
Llama 4 Maverick uses 73.9x more headings
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)
Llama 4 Maverick
51%Vocabulary42%
18wSentence Length24w
0.46Hedging0.76
3.4Bold3.7
5.6Lists6.3
0.00Emoji0.00
0.00Headings0.74
0.06Transitions0.11
Based on 15 + 12 text responses
vsAsk them anything yourself
279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.
We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.
Free preview13 of 58 slides
FAQ