Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Compare Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) by Meta AI against MiMo-V2.5-Pro by Xiaomi, context windows of 128K vs 1.0M, tested across 51 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)Runner-up
No community votes yet. On paper, MiMo-V2.5-Pro has the edge — bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) is 3.8x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)
Input
$0.59
1.7× cheaper
Output
$0.79
3.8× cheaper
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Input
$1.00
Output
$3.00
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) is cheaper on both — 1.7× input, 3.8× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
31%
MiMo-V2.5-Pro uses 62.5x more emoji
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
51%Vocabulary58%
18wSentence Length22w
0.46Hedging0.61
3.4Bold5.7
5.6Lists3.1
0.00Emoji0.63
0.00Headings1.40
0.06Transitions0.02
Based on 15 + 27 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
