Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) vs MiniMax M1
Compare Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) by Meta AI against MiniMax M1 by MiniMax, context windows of 128K vs 1.0M, tested across 52 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
MiniMax M1
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)Runner-up
No community votes yet. On paper, MiniMax M1 has the edge — bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)
Input
$0.59
Output
$0.79
2.1× cheaper
MiniMax M1
Input
$0.30
2.0× cheaper
Output
$1.65
MiniMax M1 wins input (2.0× cheaper)·Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) wins output (2.1× cheaper)
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
55%
MiniMax M1 uses 10.4x more emoji
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)
MiniMax M1
51%Vocabulary53%
18wSentence Length17w
0.46Hedging0.51
3.4Bold7.4
5.6Lists6.2
0.00Emoji0.10
0.00Headings0.86
0.06Transitions0.03
Based on 15 + 14 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
