Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) vs Meta: Muse Spark 1.1
Compare Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) and Meta: Muse Spark 1.1, both from Meta AI, context windows of 128K vs 1.0M, tested across 52 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
Meta: Muse Spark 1.1
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)Runner-up
No community votes yet. On paper, Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 has the edge — newer, bigger context window.
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) is 5.4x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)
Input
$0.59
2.1× cheaper
Output
$0.79
5.4× cheaper
Meta: Muse Spark 1.1
Input
$1.25
Output
$4.25
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) is cheaper on both — 2.1× input, 5.4× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
50%
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)
Meta: Muse Spark 1.1
51%Vocabulary61%
18wSentence Length20w
0.46Hedging0.10
3.4Bold3.7
5.6Lists2.0
0.00Emoji0.01
0.00Headings0.52
0.06Transitions0.02
Based on 15 + 29 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
