Llama 4 Maverick
Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.
Llama 4 Maverick vs GPT OSS 120B
Compare Llama 4 Maverick by Meta AI against GPT OSS 120B by OpenAI, in 26 community votes, gpt oss 120b wins 70% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 1.0M vs 131K, tested across 48 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, Llama 4 Maverick or GPT OSS 120B?
GPT OSS 120B is the better choice overall, winning 70% of 26 blind community votes on Rival. Llama 4 Maverick costs $1.5/M input tokens vs $0.18/M for GPT OSS 120B. Context windows: 1000K vs 131K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Llama 4 Maverick and GPT OSS 120B
Llama 4 Maverick is made by meta while GPT OSS 120B is from openai. Llama 4 Maverick has a 1000K token context window compared to GPT OSS 120B's 131K. On pricing, Llama 4 Maverick costs $1.5/M input tokens vs $0.18/M for GPT OSS 120B. In community voting, In 26 community votes, GPT OSS 120B wins 70% of head-to-head duels.
In 26 community votes, GPT OSS 120B wins 70% of head-to-head duels. GPT OSS 120B leads in Web Design, Image Generation. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 26+ human preference judgments for this pair.
Web Design: GPT OSS 120B wins 64% of votes
Image Generation: GPT OSS 120B wins 75% of votes
Our Verdict
GPT OSS 120BWinner
Llama 4 MaverickRunner-up
Pick GPT OSS 120B. In 26 blind votes, GPT OSS 120B wins 70% of the time. That's not luck.
GPT OSS 120B particularly excels in Image Generation, Web Design. GPT OSS 120B is 3.1x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Clear winner
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
98%
GPT OSS 120B uses 15.4x more emoji
Llama 4 Maverick
GPT OSS 120B
42%Vocabulary52%
24wSentence Length19w
0.76Hedging0.28
3.7Bold7.4
6.3Lists1.8
0.00Emoji0.15
0.74Headings0.73
0.11Transitions0.17
Based on 12 + 21 text responses
vsAsk them anything yourself
FAQ