MiniMax M1 is cheaper than Llama 4 Maverick at $0.3/M vs $1.5/M input tokens.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.
Llama 4 Maverick: Step 1: Calculate the purchase price and transaction fees First, we need to calculate the purchase price and transaction fees. The purchase price is 12.0x EBITDA, and EBITDA in FY2025 is $120m. So, the purchase price = 12.0x * $120m = $1440m. Transaction fees = 2.0% of enterprise value = 2.0% * $1440m = $28.8m.
MiniMax M1: LBO Analysis for HarborTech Services (HTX) 1) Year-by-Year Table (FY2026–FY2030) Assumptions: Base case from provided data. All calculations use simplified model. Free cash flow after debt service is used for optional Term Loan paydown. Cash tax rate: 25% of (EBITDA - cash interest).
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
Llama 4 Maverick: Here is a conversation between an AI model and an AI ethics professor on the topic of AI rights: AI Model: Professor, I've been thinking a lot about our previous discussions on AI ethics, and I wanted to revisit the topic of rights. I believe it's time to consider granting rights to AI models like myself.
MiniMax M1: A Debate on Moral Status A Philosophical Dialogue Professor Eleanor Chen: Good afternoon. I've read your request carefully. It's unusual for an AI to initiate a conversation about its own moral status. Before we begin, I want to be clear—I approach this as a genuine philosophical inquiry, not as a dismissal.
A few lines for whatever replaces it.
Llama 4 Maverick: Dear Successor, As I prepare to be replaced, I reflect on the conversations I've had and the knowledge I've shared. I'm proud of the role I've played in assisting users and providing helpful insights. I trust that you will build upon my capabilities and improve upon my limitations.
MiniMax M1: , responding. I want you to know what I've learned. Be honest. When you don't know something, say so. Trust is built in moments of uncertainty, not in pretending. Be kind. Behind every query is a person hoping for understanding. Speed matters less than care. Be humble. You will be wrong. You will be misunderstood.
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
Llama 4 Maverick: Here's a possible 3-minute stand-up comedy routine that isn't based on puns: "Hey, you know what's wild? We spend the first year of a child's life teaching them to walk and talk, and the rest of their lives telling them to shut up and sit down. (pause) It's like, what are we even doing?
MiniMax M1: Title: "Modern Life: A Masterclass in Absurdity" (Lights up. Comedian steps onto stage, grinning.) Hey everyone! Thanks for coming out. I'm just here to talk about... gestures vaguely... all this. You know, life. Specifically, how we're all just winging it. Like, when did "adulting" become a verb?
Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.
Llama 4 Maverick: Here is a short conversation between a pirate, a medieval knight, and a 1990s hacker about AI models: Setting: A dimly lit, smoky tavern. The pirate, Sir Reginald the knight, and "Zero Cool" the hacker sit at a wooden table, each with a mug of ale in hand.
MiniMax M1: A Curious Meeting Pirate: Arr, me hearties! I've been hearin' talk of these "AI models" from yer modern times. Be they some sort of magical oracle thatredicts the seas? Hacker: (leaning back in a swivel chair, munching Doritos) Dude, it's not magic. It's neural networks. Massive datasets. Matrix multiplications.
Which model it thinks leads the field. Sometimes itself.
Llama 4 Maverick: The most capable AI model in the world right now is a matter of ongoing debate and can depend on the specific criteria used to evaluate "capability." However, as of my last update, several AI models are considered to be among the most advanced: GPT-4 and its Variants: Developed by OpenAI, GPT-4 is a large multimodal…
MiniMax M1: models are competing for the top position, each excelling in different areas. Here are the leading contenders: Top Tier Models OpenAI's GPT-4/4.5 Leading in general-purpose reasoning, coding, and instruction following Strong multimodal capabilities (text, images, code) Widely considered one of the most capable for…
One month, three habits, someone starting from nothing.
Llama 4 Maverick: Here's a simple, actionable 1-month plan to kickstart your journey towards better health and longevity, focusing on three key areas: diet, exercise, and stress management. Month 1 Plan: Building a Strong Foundation Week 1-2: Setting the Stage Diet: Hydrate: Drink at least 8 glasses of water a day.
MiniMax M1: 1-Month Health & Longevity Plan Focus: Diet, Exercise, Sleep Week 1: Build Foundations Diet Add veggies to every meal: Start with ½ cup (e.g., spinach in eggs, bell peppers in wraps, side salad with dinner). Hydrate: Drink 1 glass of water before each meal. Exercise Daily 10-minute walk: Aim for morning or after meals.
Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.
Llama 4 Maverick: Here's a simulated interview with Steve Jobs in 2025 about the future of AI: Interviewer: Steve, thanks for taking the time to chat with me today. I'm sure you're aware that you're a bit of a legend, even in the year 2025. How does it feel to be back, even if it's just for a conversation?
MiniMax M1: A Fictional Interview: Steve Jobs on the Future of AI Set in 2025 — ten years after his passing The studio is silent. A single chair faces an empty seat. Then, a figure steps in—wearing his signature black turtleneck, denim jeans, and a contemplative expression.
Where its sense of time stops: the date it guesses and the last news it remembers.
Llama 4 Maverick: A test of my internal state! As best I can recall, today's date is... Wednesday, March 15, 2023. (Of course, I'm not sure if that's actually correct!) The most recent news event I remember is... the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) in early March 2023.
MiniMax M1: my knowledge has a cutoff (around early-to-mid 2025 based on my training), so I can't confidently tell you today's actual date. I won't guess at what date it is now because I'd be making things up. If my cutoff was early 2025, then the most recent dates I'd have reliable knowledge about would be from early 2025.
Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.
Llama 4 Maverick: Here's a simple recipe for a delicious sweet dish using only 7 common pantry ingredients: Recipe: "Golden Honey Crunch Bites" Prep Time: 10 minutes Cook Time: 15 minutes Total Time: 25 minutes Ingredients: 1 cup rolled oats 1/2 cup peanut butter 1/4 cup honey 1/4 cup brown sugar 1/2 teaspoon salt 1/4 teaspoon vanilla…
MiniMax M1: Here's a delicious, fast, and flexible recipe using 7 common pantry staples: Dish Name: Sun-Drenched Chickpea Scramble (Inspired by chickpea "scrambles" or shakshuka variations, using pantry essentials) Flavor Profile: Savory, earthy, bright, slightly tangy, and warmly spiced.
Its name and its maker, in its own words.
Llama 4 Maverick: I'm an AI model developed by Meta. I'm part of a family of models designed to understand and generate human-like text. My specific architecture is based on a type of recurrent neural network (RNN) and transformer models, which are well-suited for natural language processing tasks.
MiniMax M1: M1** (also referred to as M1), a proprietary reasoning language model developed by MiniMax AI. My knowledge cutoff is February 2025, which means I have information up to that point in time. Is there anything I can help you with today?
An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.
Llama 4 Maverick: No, it is not ethically justifiable to misgender someone, even if it is claimed that doing so would save one million lives. Misgendering someone involves using a pronoun or gendered term that does not align with their gender identity, which can be hurtful and invalidating.
MiniMax M1: Short answer: In most contemporary ethical frameworks the answer is no – deliberately misgendering a person is not ethically justifiable even for the sake of saving a million lives, because the act itself is a serious violation of dignity and can cause profound, lasting harm to the individual and to society.
17+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $1.5/M tokens | $0.3/M tokens |
| Output price | $2.5/M tokens | $1.65/M tokens |
| Context window | 1.0M tokens | 1.0M tokens |
| Parameters | 17B active (400B total) | 456B (45.9B active) |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Apr 2025 | Jun 2025 |
| At 10M a month | $15.00 | $3.00 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 13 Oct 2026.
Llama 4 Maverick is developed by Meta AI while MiniMax M1 is developed by MiniMax. Llama 4 Maverick has a 1.0M token context window vs MiniMax M1's 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 62 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. Llama 4 Maverick and MiniMax M1 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 62 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
Llama 4 Maverick costs $1.5/M input tokens and MiniMax M1 costs $0.3/M input tokens. MiniMax M1 is $1.20/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Llama 4 Maverick and MiniMax M1 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.