Llama 4 Scout vs o1

Compare Llama 4 Scout by Meta AI against o1 by OpenAI, context windows of 10.0M vs 128K, tested across 53 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.

Which is better, Llama 4 Scout or o1?

Llama 4 Scout and o1 are both competitive models. Llama 4 Scout costs $0.25/M input tokens vs $15/M for o1. Context windows: 10000K vs 128K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between Llama 4 Scout and o1

Llama 4 Scout is made by meta while o1 is from openai. Llama 4 Scout has a 10000K token context window compared to o1's 128K. On pricing, Llama 4 Scout costs $0.25/M input tokens vs $15/M for o1.

Our Verdict
Llama 4 Scout
Llama 4 Scout
o1
o1Runner-up

No community votes yet. On paper, Llama 4 Scout has the edge — newer, bigger context window.

Llama 4 Scout is 120x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.

Too close to call
Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
93%

o1 uses 9.1x more transitions

Llama 4 Scout
o1
43%Vocabulary64%
42wSentence Length16w
0.81Hedging0.76
4.1Bold5.0
7.3Lists2.6
0.00Emoji0.00
0.30Headings0.44
0.04Transitions0.40
Based on 10 + 13 text responses
vs

Ask them anything yourself

Llama 4 Scouto1

279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.

We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.

AI Hallucination Index 2026
Free preview13 of 58 slides
FAQ

Common questions