Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. MercuryvsQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Updated Jul 2025

MercuryvsQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 is cheaper than Mercury at $0.2/M vs $10/M input tokens.

Mercury and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 compared across 55 shared prompts
SpecMercuryQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Input price$10/M tokens$0.2/M tokens
Output price$10/M tokens$0.8/M tokens
Context window32K tokens131K tokens
Weights—Open
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedJun 2025Jul 2025
Our Verdict
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Mercury
MercuryRunner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 costs 13x less per token.

Slight edge
API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Mercury
Input
$10.00
Output
$10.00
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Input
$0.20
50× cheaper
Output
$0.80
13× cheaper

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 is cheaper on both: 50× input, 13× output.

Where to run it

4 hosts, cheapest first

Mercury

No hosts listed on OpenRouter.

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 25074 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
SStreamLake$0.05 in·$0.19 out·128k·98.9% upSSiliconFlowfp8$0.09 in·$0.30 out·262k·97.7% upNNebiusfp8$0.10 in·$0.30 out·262k·95% upAlibaba Cloud$0.13 in·$0.52 out·131k·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 9 Sep 2026.

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
43%

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 uses 39.7x more emoji

Mercury
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
60%Vocabulary55%
31wSentence Length19w
0.78Hedging0.46
4.1Bold6.4
2.8Lists3.9
0.03Emoji1.10
0.88Headings0.86
0.06Transitions0.14
Based on 26 + 28 text responses
Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Mercury logoOx Alpha logo
Mercury vs Ox AlphaNew provider
Mercury logoMiniMax M2.7 logo
Mercury vs MiniMax M2.7New provider
Mercury logoMiniMax M3 logo
Mercury vs MiniMax M3New provider
Mercury logoAurora Alpha logo
Mercury vs Aurora AlphaNew provider
Mercury logoGPT-4.5 logo
Mercury vs GPT-4.5New provider
Mercury logoGPT-4o (Omni) logo
Mercury vs GPT-4o (Omni)New provider
Mercury logoGPT-4o mini logo
Mercury vs GPT-4o miniNew provider
Mercury logoGPT-5 logo
Mercury vs GPT-5New provider
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed