MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Qwen3.8 Max
Compare MiMo-V2.5-Pro by Xiaomi against Qwen3.8 Max by Qwen, context windows of 1.0M vs 1.0M, tested across 21 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Qwen3.8 Max
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Input
$1.00
2.0× cheaper
Output
$3.00
2.0× cheaper
Qwen3.8 Max
Input
$2.00
Output
$6.00
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is cheaper on both — 2.0× input, 2.0× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
60%
MiMo-V2.5-Pro uses 62.5x more emoji
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Qwen3.8 Max
58%Vocabulary48%
22wSentence Length17w
0.61Hedging0.95
5.7Bold4.3
3.1Lists8.2
0.63Emoji0.00
1.40Headings1.92
0.02Transitions0.02
Based on 27 + 13 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
