MiMo-V2.5 vs Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)
Compare MiMo-V2.5 by Xiaomi against Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) by Qwen, context windows of 1.0M vs 1.0M, tested across 37 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
MiMo-V2.5
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
MiMo-V2.5
Input
$0.40
Output
$2.00
2.0× cheaper
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)
Input
$0.40
Output
$4.00
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
63%
MiMo-V2.5 uses 3.0x more emoji
MiMo-V2.5
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)
57%Vocabulary54%
17wSentence Length15w
0.64Hedging0.36
5.9Bold7.0
2.8Lists4.6
1.01Emoji0.34
1.07Headings0.94
0.07Transitions0.09
Based on 27 + 18 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
