MiniMax M1 vs Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Compare MiniMax M1 by MiniMax against Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 by Qwen, context windows of 1.0M vs 262K, tested across 54 shared challenges. Updated June 2026.
Which is better, MiniMax M1 or Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507?
MiniMax M1 and Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 are both competitive models. MiniMax M1 costs $0.3/M input tokens vs $0.071/M for Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507. Context windows: 1000K vs 262K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between MiniMax M1 and Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
MiniMax M1 is made by minimax while Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is from qwen. MiniMax M1 has a 1000K token context window compared to Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507's 262K. On pricing, MiniMax M1 costs $0.3/M input tokens vs $0.071/M for Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507.
Per 1M tokens
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is cheaper on both — 4.2× input, 5.8× output
No community votes yet. On paper, MiniMax M1 has the edge — bigger model tier, bigger context window.
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is 5.8x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Style Comparison
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 uses 6.5x more emoji
