MiniMax M2.5vsQwen3 Coder Flash
MiniMax M2.5 has a larger context window than Qwen3 Coder Flash (205K tokens vs 128K tokens).
| Spec | MiniMax M2.5 | Qwen3 Coder Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.3/M tokens | $0.3/M tokens |
| Output price | $1.2/M tokens | $1.5/M tokens |
| Context window | 205K tokens | 128K tokens |
| Weights | Open | Closed |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Feb 2026 | Sep 2025 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 80.2% | 50.3% |
Our Verdict
MiniMax M2.5
Qwen3 Coder FlashRunner-up
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, MiniMax M2.5 has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.
Slight edge
Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
MiniMax M2.5
Input
$0.30
Output
$1.20
1.3× cheaper
Qwen3 Coder Flash
Input
$0.30
Output
$1.50
Where to run it
8 hosts, cheapest first
MiniMax M2.57 hosts
Qwen3 Coder Flash1 host
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 13 Sep 2026.
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
55%
Qwen3 Coder Flash uses 14.8x more emoji
MiniMax M2.5
Qwen3 Coder Flash
55%Vocabulary60%
25wSentence Length85w
0.58Hedging0.56
6.0Bold5.6
4.4Lists5.8
0.01Emoji0.22
1.11Headings1.49
0.16Transitions0.15
Based on 23 + 28 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
More comparisons
Qwen3 Coder Flash vs MiniMax M2.7Cross-provider
Qwen3 Coder Flash vs Ox AlphaNew provider
Qwen3 Coder Flash vs MiniMax M3Cross-provider
Qwen3 Coder Flash vs Aurora AlphaNew provider
MiniMax M2.5 vs GPT-5 ProNew provider
MiniMax M2.5 vs GPT-5.1New provider
MiniMax M2.5 vs GPT-5.1 ChatNew provider
MiniMax M2.5 vs GPT-5.1-CodexNew provider