MiniMax M2.7 vs Qwen: Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Compare MiniMax M2.7 by MiniMax against Qwen: Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 by Qwen, context windows of 205K vs 131K, tested across 53 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
MiniMax M2.7
Qwen: Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Runner-up
No community votes yet. On paper, MiniMax M2.7 has the edge — newer, bigger context window.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
MiniMax M2.7
Input
$0.30
Output
$1.20
Qwen: Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Input
$0.20
1.5× cheaper
Output
$0.80
1.5× cheaper
Qwen: Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 is cheaper on both — 1.5× input, 1.5× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
61%
Qwen: Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 uses 3.7x more emoji
MiniMax M2.7
Qwen: Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
56%Vocabulary55%
26wSentence Length18w
0.50Hedging0.52
6.8Bold6.7
3.5Lists4.3
0.28Emoji1.04
1.20Headings0.92
0.11Transitions0.11
Based on 23 + 22 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
