MiniMax M2.7 vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Compare MiniMax M2.7 by MiniMax against Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking by Qwen, context windows of 205K vs 66K, tested across 53 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
MiniMax M2.7
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingRunner-up
No community votes yet. On paper, MiniMax M2.7 has the edge — newer, bigger context window.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
MiniMax M2.7
Input
$0.30
Output
$1.20
1.3× cheaper
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Input
$0.15
2.0× cheaper
Output
$1.50
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking wins input (2.0× cheaper)·MiniMax M2.7 wins output (1.3× cheaper)
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
69%
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking uses 2.0x more emoji
MiniMax M2.7
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
56%Vocabulary54%
26wSentence Length16w
0.50Hedging0.31
6.8Bold6.0
3.5Lists4.5
0.28Emoji0.58
1.20Headings0.88
0.11Transitions0.10
Based on 23 + 17 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
