MiniMax M2.7vsQwen3.5 397B A17B
Qwen3.5 397B A17B wins 60% of 26 blind community votes against MiniMax M2.7 on Rival.
| Spec | MiniMax M2.7 | Qwen3.5 397B A17B |
|---|---|---|
| Win rate | 40% | 60% |
| Input price | $0.3/M tokens | $0.6/M tokens |
| Output price | $1.2/M tokens | $3.6/M tokens |
| Context window | 205K tokens | 262K tokens |
| Released | Mar 2026 | Feb 2026 |
Our Verdict
Qwen3.5 397B A17BWinner
MiniMax M2.7Runner-up
Pick Qwen3.5 397B A17B. In 26 blind votes, Qwen3.5 397B A17B wins 60% of the time. That's not luck.
Qwen3.5 397B A17B takes Image Generation. MiniMax M2.7 costs 3.0x less per token.
Clear winner
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
MiniMax M2.7
Input
$0.30
2.0× cheaper
Output
$1.20
3.0× cheaper
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Input
$0.60
Output
$3.60
MiniMax M2.7 is cheaper on both — 2.0× input, 3.0× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
35%
MiniMax M2.7 uses 1.8x more sentence length
MiniMax M2.7
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
56%Vocabulary54%
26wSentence Length14w
0.50Hedging0.39
6.8Bold6.9
3.5Lists4.2
0.28Emoji0.23
1.20Headings0.93
0.11Transitions0.17
Based on 23 + 23 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
More comparisons
MiniMax M2.7 vs Ox AlphaNew provider
Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs MiniMax M3Cross-provider
MiniMax M2.7 vs GPT-5New provider
MiniMax M2.7 vs Llama 4 MaverickNew provider
MiniMax M2.7 vs Sherlock Think AlphaNew provider
MiniMax M2.7 vs Solar Pro 3New provider
MiniMax M2.7 vs Sonar Pro SearchNew provider
MiniMax M2.7 vs Sonoma Dusk AlphaNew provider