MiniMax M3 vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Compare MiniMax M3 by MiniMax against Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B by Qwen, context windows of 1.0M vs 1.0M, tested across 53 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
MiniMax M3Runner-up
No community votes yet. On paper, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B has the edge — bigger model tier, newer.
MiniMax M3 is 5.0x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
MiniMax M3
Input
$0.30
6.7× cheaper
Output
$1.20
5.0× cheaper
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Input
$2.00
Output
$6.00
MiniMax M3 is cheaper on both — 6.7× input, 5.0× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
55%
MiniMax M3 uses 115.0x more emoji
MiniMax M3
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
55%Vocabulary53%
24wSentence Length18w
0.52Hedging0.83
5.2Bold3.1
3.0Lists4.3
1.15Emoji0.00
1.21Headings1.34
0.02Transitions0.05
Based on 27 + 27 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
