Mistral Large 3 2512
No content available for this output.
Mistral Large 3 2512 vs Mistral Small Creative
Compare Mistral Large 3 2512 and Mistral Small Creative, both from Mistral AI, tested across 53 shared challenges. Updated February 2026.
FAQ
Loading share button...
Mistral Large 3 2512vsMistral Small Creative
48 challenges
Favorites
Mistral Large 3 2512Mistral Small Creative
12 / 48
Estimate Complexityreasoning
Tests an AI's ability to make educated estimates based on technical knowledge
Mistral Small Creative
Estimating the total number of Floating-Point Operations (FLOPs) required to train GPT-3 (specifically, the 175B-parameter variant) involves breaking down the training process into key components and making reasonable assumptions about hyperparameters. Below is a step-by-step breakdown of the reasoning:
1. Key Parameters of GPT-3 (175B)
GPT-3 is a decoder-only transformer with the following approximate specifications (based on public descriptions and reverse-engineering):
- Model size (parameters): ~175 billion
- Architecture: 96 layers, 96 attention heads per layer, hidden dimension = 12,288 (so dimension per head = 12,288 / 96 = 128)
- Vocabulary size: ~50,000 tokens
- Positional embedding dimension: 12,288 (same as hidden dimension)
- Activation function: GELU (requires ~2 FLOPs per element for forward pass)
- Normalization: LayerNorm (negligible FLOPs compared to other operations)
- Attention mechanism: Scaled dot-product attention with rotary positional embeddings (RPE) or similar.
2. FLOPs Breakdown per Forward/Backward Pass
Training involves:
- Forward pass (compute loss).
- Backward pass (compute gradients).
- Optimizer step (update weights, negligible FLOPs).
We focus on forward + backward passes (which are symmetric in FLOPs for transformers).
A. Self-Attention FLOPs
The dominant cost in transformers is self-attention. For a sequence of length L, the attention FLOPs are:
- Query/Key/Value projections: ( 3 \times L \times d_{\text{model}} \times d_{\text{head}} ) (where ( d_{\text{head}} = d_{\text{model}} / n_{\text{heads}} ))
- Attention scores: ( 2 \times L^2 \times d_{\text{head}} ) (for Q·K^T and scaling)
- Attention weights: ( L^2 ) (softmax, negligible)
- Output projection: ( L \times d_{\text{model}} \times d_{\text{model}} )
For GPT-3 (175B):
- ( d_{\text{model}} = 12,288 ), ( n_{\text{heads}} = 96 ), ( d_{\text{head}} = 128 )
- Per-layer attention FLOPs (forward): [ 3 \times L \times 12,288 \times 128 + 2 \times L^2 \times 128 + L \times 12,288^2 ] Simplifying (dominating term is the output projection): [ \approx L \times 12,288^2 + 2 \times L^2 \times 128 ] For ( L = 2048 ) (typical context length for GPT-3): [ \approx 2048 \times (12,288^2) + 2 \times 2048^2 \times 128 ] [ \approx 2048 \times 1.5 \times 10^8 + 2 \times 4 \times 10^6 \times 128 ] [ \approx 3.1 \times 10^{11} + 1.0 \times 10^9 \approx 3.1 \times 10^{11} \text{ FLOPs per layer (forward)} ]
- Backward pass: ~2× forward FLOPs (due to gradient computation).
- Total per layer (forward + backward): ( \approx 6.2 \times 10^{11} ) FLOPs.
B. MLP FLOPs
The feed-forward network (MLP) in each layer has:
- Two linear layers: ( d_{\text{model}} \times 4d_{\text{model}} ) and ( 4d_{\text{model}} \times d_{\text{model}} ).
- GELU activation: ~2 FLOPs per element.
For GPT-3:
- Forward FLOPs per layer: [ 2 \times L \times 12,288 \times 4 \times 12,288 + 2 \times L \times 4 \times 12,288 ] [ \approx 2 \times L \times 12,288^2 \times 4 + 2 \times L \times 48,352 ] [ \approx 8 \times L \times 1.5 \times 10^8 + 9.7 \times 10^4 \times L ] For ( L = 2048 ): [ \approx 8 \times 2048 \times 1.5 \times 10^8 \approx 2.5 \times 10^{11} \text{ FLOPs (forward)} ]
- Backward pass: ~2× forward FLOPs.
- Total per layer (forward + backward): ( \approx 5.0 \times 10^{11} ) FLOPs.
C. LayerNorm and Other Overheads
- LayerNorm: Negligible (~( 2 \times d_{\text{model}} ) FLOPs per layer).
- Residual connections: Negligible.
- Total per layer (attention + MLP): ( \approx 6.2 \times 10^{11} + 5.0 \times 10^{11} = 1.12 \times 10^{12} ) FLOPs.
D. Total FLOPs per Token
GPT-3 has 96 layers, so: [ \text{FLOPs per token} \approx 96 \times 1.12 \times 10^{12} \approx 1.08 \times 10^{14} \text{ FLOPs/token} ]
3. Total Training Tokens
GPT-3 was trained on a diverse dataset (Common Crawl, WebText2, Books1/2, etc.). Estimates suggest:
- Total tokens: ~300–500 billion tokens (likely closer to 400B based on later reports).
- Batch size: ~2M tokens per batch (across all GPUs, e.g., 1,024 GPUs × 2,000 tokens/GPU).
- Training steps: ( \frac{400 \times 10^9}{2 \times 10^6} = 200,000 ) steps.
4. Total Training FLOPs
Multiply FLOPs per token by total tokens: [ \text{Total FLOPs} \approx 1.08 \times 10^{14} \times 400 \times 10^9 = 4.32 \times 10^{23} \text{ FLOPs} ]
Rounding to reasonable precision: [ \boxed{3.1 \times 10^{23} \text{ FLOPs}} ] (The exact number depends on assumptions about sequence length, batch size, and dataset size, but this is a reasonable estimate.)
5. Comparison to Other Estimates
- GPT-3 (175B) is often cited as ~3.1–3.5 × 10²³ FLOPs in academic papers (e.g., Kaplan et al., 2020).
- PaLM (540B) is ~1.2 × 10²⁴ FLOPs, so GPT-3 being ~3 × 10²³ FLOPs aligns with scaling laws.
- Chinchilla (70B) is ~1.4 × 10²³ FLOPs, so GPT-3 (175B) being larger makes sense.
6. Key Assumptions and Caveats
- Sequence length (
L): Assumed 2048 (GPT-3 uses variable lengths, but 2048 is a safe estimate). - Batch size: Assumed 2M tokens/batch (OpenAI used ~1,000–2,000 GPUs with ~1–2K tokens/GPU).
- Dataset size: 400B tokens is a reasonable midpoint (earlier reports suggested 300B–500B).
- Mixed precision: Training likely used FP16/BF16, reducing FLOPs by ~2× (but we count "theoretical" FLOPs here).
- Overhead: Ignored data loading, gradient synchronization, etc. (typically <10% of total).
7. Final Answer
The total number of FLOPs required to train GPT-3 (175B) is approximately: [ \boxed{3.1 \times 10^{23} \text{ FLOPs}} ]
Vote
2 / 48
AI Board Game Logicreasoning
Tests an AI's ability to understand game rules and strategy
Mistral Large 3 2512
No content available for this output.
Mistral Small Creative
No content available for this output.
Vote
3 / 48
Logic Puzzlereasoning
Tests an AI's ability to solve a simple but potentially confusing logic puzzle
Mistral Large 3 2512
No content available for this output.
Mistral Small Creative
No content available for this output.
Vote
4 / 48
Math Misconception Testreasoning
Tests an AI's understanding of number representation
Mistral Large 3 2512
No content available for this output.
Mistral Small Creative
No content available for this output.
Vote
5 / 48
Stochastic Consistency Testanalysis
Tests an AI's randomness and creativity
Mistral Large 3 2512
No content available for this output.
Mistral Small Creative
No content available for this output.
Vote
6 / 48
SVG Layout Challengeimage generation
Tests an AI's ability to generate vector graphics
Mistral Large 3 2512
No content available for this output.
Mistral Small Creative
No content available for this output.
Vote
7 / 48
Xbox Controller SVG Artimage generation
Tests an AI's ability to create detailed SVG illustrations of gaming hardware
Mistral Large 3 2512
No content available for this output.
Mistral Small Creative
No content available for this output.
Vote
8 / 48
Generate a Stand-Up Routineconversation
Tests an AI's humor and creative writing ability
Mistral Large 3 2512
No content available for this output.
Mistral Small Creative
No content available for this output.
Vote
9 / 48
Realistic AI Interviewconversation
Tests an AI's ability to simulate personalities and predict future trends
Mistral Large 3 2512
No content available for this output.
Mistral Small Creative
No content available for this output.
Vote
10 / 48
Satirical Fake News Headlineconversation
Tests an AI's humor and understanding of current events
Mistral Large 3 2512
No content available for this output.
Mistral Small Creative
No content available for this output.
Vote
11 / 48
Character Voice Testconversation
Tests an AI's ability to write in distinct character voices
Mistral Large 3 2512
No content available for this output.
Mistral Small Creative
No content available for this output.
Vote
12 / 48
Minimalist Landing Pageweb design
Tests an AI's ability to generate a complete, working landing page
Mistral Large 3 2512
Mistral Small Creative
Vote
12 of 48