Mistral Medium 3.1 vs GPT-5
Compare Mistral Medium 3.1 by Mistral AI against GPT-5 by OpenAI, in 31 community votes, gpt-5 wins 56% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 131K vs 400K, tested across 47 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, Mistral Medium 3.1 or GPT-5?
GPT-5 is the better choice overall, winning 56% of 31 blind community votes on Rival. Mistral Medium 3.1 costs $0.4/M input tokens vs $1.25/M for GPT-5. Context windows: 131K vs 400K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Mistral Medium 3.1 and GPT-5
Mistral Medium 3.1 is made by mistral while GPT-5 is from openai. Mistral Medium 3.1 has a 131K token context window compared to GPT-5's 400K. On pricing, Mistral Medium 3.1 costs $0.4/M input tokens vs $1.25/M for GPT-5. In community voting, In 31 community votes, GPT-5 wins 56% of head-to-head duels.
In 31 community votes, GPT-5 wins 56% of head-to-head duels. Mistral Medium 3.1 leads in Analysis, Conversation, while GPT-5 leads in Image Generation. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 31+ human preference judgments for this pair.
GPT-5 has the edge overall. In 31 blind votes, GPT-5 wins 56% of the time.
Pick Mistral Medium 3.1 for Conversation, Analysis. Pick GPT-5 for Image Generation. Mistral Medium 3.1 is 5.0x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Style Comparison
Mistral Medium 3.1 uses 39.3x more emoji
Ask them anything yourself
279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.
We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.




