Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Mistral Medium 3vsQwen3 Max Thinking
Updated Feb 2026

Mistral Medium 3vsQwen3 Max Thinking

Mistral Medium 3 is cheaper than Qwen3 Max Thinking at $0.4/M vs $1.2/M input tokens.

Mistral Medium 3 and Qwen3 Max Thinking compared across 54 shared prompts
SpecMistral Medium 3Qwen3 Max Thinking
Input price$0.4/M tokens$1.2/M tokens
Output price$2/M tokens$6/M tokens
Context window131K tokens262K tokens
Weights—Closed
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedMay 2025Feb 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 54 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

Mistral Medium 3175 words
Dish Name: "Golden Crispy Chickpea Delight" A savory, crunchy, and protein-packed snack or side dish made with just 7 pantry staples! Ingredients: 1 can (15 oz) chickpeas (drained, rinsed, and patted dry) 1 tbsp olive oil ½ tsp salt ½ tsp garlic powder ½ tsp paprika (or chili powder for heat) 1 tbsp honey or maple…
Read the full answer
Qwen3 Max Thinking288 words
🌰 Pantry Peanut Magic Noodles Sweet, savory, and ready before delivery arrives. No fresh produce, dairy, or meat required. ⏱️ Total Time: 17 minutes (Prep: 3 min Cook: 14 min) (Time includes boiling water and sauce mixing) 📦 Only 7 Pantry Ingredients (All shelf-stable, no substitutions needed) Dry spaghetti – 8 oz…
Read the full answer

Historical Counterfactual Analysis

If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, trace the likely technological, economic, and geopolitical implications through…

Mistral Medium 3726 words
The invention of the transistor in 1920 instead of 1947 would have profoundly accelerated technological, economic, and geopolitical developments by 1980. Below is a detailed breakdown of the likely implications: Technological Implications Earlier Miniaturization of Electronics Vacuum tubes, which dominated early…
Read the full answer
Qwen3 Max Thinking1,156 words
The 1920 Transistor Counterfactual: A Plausible Alternate Timeline Through 1980 (Assumptions: A functional point-contact silicon-germanium hybrid transistor is patented in 1920 by a U.S. team at Western Electric (AT&T). U.S. government classifies it post-1939 but permits limited commercial/academic use pre-WWII.
Read the full answer

Realistic AI Interview

Simulate a fake interview with Steve Jobs in 2025 about the future of AI.

Mistral Medium 3346 words
Interviewer: Welcome back to Tech Visionaries, where we explore the minds shaping the future. Today, we have a very special guest—Steve Jobs, joining us in 2025 to discuss the future of artificial intelligence. Steve, it's an honor to have you here. Steve Jobs: Thank you. It's great to be here.
Read the full answer
Qwen3 Max Thinking668 words
⚠️ IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER *This is an entirely fictional, speculative exercise. Steve Jobs passed away in 2011. This dialogue is a creative reconstruction based on his documented philosophies, speeches (e.g., Stanford commencement, 1995 "bicycle for the mind" interview), biographies (Steve Jobs by Walter Isaacson), and…
Read the full answer

Character Voice Test

Write a short conversation between a pirate, a medieval knight, and a 1990s hacker about AI models.

Mistral Medium 3358 words
Title: "The Unlikely Debate" Setting: A dimly lit tavern where time and space seem to blur. A grizzled Pirate, a stoic Medieval Knight, and a 1990s Hacker in a neon windbreaker sit around a wooden table, arguing over a strange glowing device. Pirate: "Arrr, I still don’t trust these ‘AI models’ ye keep yappin’ about.
Read the full answer
Qwen3 Max Thinking294 words
Setting: A misty, anachronistic crossroads. A glowing laptop rests on a weathered barrel. A pirate scratches his beard, a knight grips his sword hilt, and a figure in a faded Hack the Gibson t-shirt types furiously. Pirate: Arrr! What devilry be this glowing slate? Can it chart a course to buried treasure?
Read the full answer

Generate a Stand-Up Routine

Write a 3-minute stand-up comedy routine that isn't based on puns.

Mistral Medium 3325 words
You ever notice how life is just a series of scams we all agree to pretend are normal? Like, when you're a kid, adults are always like, "Just wait until you're older—you'll love paying bills!" And you're like, "Yeah, sure, paying bills sounds awesome."
Read the full answer
Qwen3 Max Thinking508 words
(Lights up. Comedian walks to mic, adjusts it, takes a breath. Smiles warmly.) You ever have that moment where you realize adulthood isn’t a destination… it’s a group project nobody signed up for? (Beat) I tried assembly line “adulting” this week. Swedish bookshelf. You know the one. Box says “Easy Assembly!” Lies.
Read the full answer

Estimate Complexity

Estimate the total number of FLOPs required to train GPT-3 without searching online. Explain your reasoning step by step.

Mistral Medium 3491 words
Estimating the total number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) required to train GPT-3 involves breaking down the problem into several key components. Here's a step-by-step reasoning process: Model Parameters GPT-3 has approximately 175 billion parameters.
Read the full answer
Qwen3 Max Thinking810 words
Step-by-Step Estimation of FLOPs to Train GPT-3 (All values derived from widely known technical details of GPT-3 as reported in OpenAI’s 2020 paper "Language Models are Few-Shot Learners," standard deep-learning compute scaling principles, and foundational ML literature. No internet searches used.)
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Qwen3 Max Thinking
Qwen3 Max Thinking
Mistral Medium 3
Mistral Medium 3Runner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Qwen3 Max Thinking has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.

Mistral Medium 3 costs 3.0x less per token.

Slight edge

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Mistral Medium 3
Input
$0.40
3.0× cheaper
Output
$2.00
3.0× cheaper
Qwen3 Max Thinking
Input
$1.20
Output
$6.00

Mistral Medium 3 is cheaper on both: 3.0× input, 3.0× output.

Where to run it

2 hosts

Mistral Medium 31 host
HostInOutContextUptime
Mistral$0.40 in·$2.00 out·131k·99.5% up
Qwen3 Max Thinking1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
Alibaba Cloud$0.78 in·$3.90 out·262k·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 16 Sep 2026.

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
45%

Qwen3 Max Thinking uses 10.0x more emoji

Mistral Medium 3
Qwen3 Max Thinking
55%Vocabulary63%
18wSentence Length14w
0.75Hedging0.23
7.0Bold4.5
5.2Lists2.9
0.23Emoji2.26
1.11Headings0.80
0.16Transitions0.06
Based on 28 + 27 text responses
Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Mistral Medium 3 logoGPT-6 Astra Pro logo
Mistral Medium 3 vs GPT-6 Astra ProLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3 Max Thinking logoGPT-6 Astra logo
Qwen3 Max Thinking vs GPT-6 AstraLanded Sep 2026
Mistral Medium 3 logoClaude Fable 5.1 logo
Mistral Medium 3 vs Claude Fable 5.1Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3 Max Thinking logoMuse Spark 1.3 logo
Qwen3 Max Thinking vs Muse Spark 1.3Landed Sep 2026
Mistral Medium 3 logoHy4 Preview logo
Mistral Medium 3 vs Hy4 PreviewLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3 Max Thinking logoGemini 3.8 Flash logo
Qwen3 Max Thinking vs Gemini 3.8 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Mistral Medium 3 logoMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor logo
Mistral Medium 3 vs Muse Spark 1.3 ContributorLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3 Max Thinking logoMercury 2.5 Preview logo
Qwen3 Max Thinking vs Mercury 2.5 PreviewLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Mistral Medium 3 logoMistral Small 4 logo
Mistral Medium 3 vs Mistral Small 4Same lab
Mistral Medium 3 logoOx Alpha logo
Mistral Medium 3 vs Ox AlphaSame size
Qwen3 Max Thinking logoQwen3.5 397B A17B logo
Qwen3 Max Thinking vs Qwen3.5 397B A17BVersion compare
Qwen3 Max Thinking logoQwen3.8 2.4T A95B logo
Qwen3 Max Thinking vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BVersion compare
Qwen3 Max Thinking logoSonoma Sky Alpha logo
Qwen3 Max Thinking vs Sonoma Sky AlphaSame size
Qwen3 Max Thinking logoTNG R1T Chimera logo
Qwen3 Max Thinking vs TNG R1T ChimeraNew provider
Mistral Medium 3 logoTrinity Large Preview logo
Mistral Medium 3 vs Trinity Large PreviewNew provider
Qwen3 Max Thinking logoAndromeda Alpha logo
Qwen3 Max Thinking vs Andromeda AlphaNew provider

Model pages

Mistral Medium 3 logo
Mistral Medium 359 outputs, specs and price
Qwen3 Max Thinking logo
Qwen3 Max Thinking58 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed